Jump to content


Public Offence and Punishment


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
128 replies to this topic

Overlord #21 Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:41 PM

    Developer

  • Military Reserve
  • 0 battles
  • 223
  • Member since:
    10-21-2011

View PostABLE0815, on 29 February 2012 - 04:29 PM, said:

And while hitting the "Admit-Button" PLEASE revive your blog. (when theres some spare time to do so)  :Smile_popcorn:

After the GDC.  :Smile_honoring:

Savarok #22 Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:42 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Senior Alpha Test Veteran
  • 0 battles
  • 164
  • Member since:
    10-19-2011
Well they were warned and now they have to deal with the consequences.



"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. but it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning"


csandazoltan #23 Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:44 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 205 battles
  • 155
  • [FOHU] FOHU
  • Member since:
    10-31-2011

View PostOverlord, on 29 February 2012 - 04:22 PM, said:

The next group will be admitted quite soon, approximately along with the new build.

I don't want to be offensive Overlord... you have my respect for your work in WoT and WoWp, but I'm outraged by this news, that honest people left out from this important step of this game development and unrespectful, savage people gets in...

I'm not judging the staff, you have no way knowing that, these people will behave this way (and i'm still not understanding the selection process)

You are doing an awesome job, developing these games, the WoT is the most played games since it came out, no game grabbed me this way earlier...

About your post: you substituded one not known date with an another, we have no knowledge about the game development, according to the NDA... Especially I don't have a clue about what do you mean by "new build"

Again, no offence intended, but i felt the urge to express myself.

Respectfully: an honest player, who is waiting for acceptance


It is so good to be a Commander of a clan


Raptor #24 Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:47 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Alpha Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
Looks like ppl thought that they will not be punished that hard, the same as with wot (ppl who made leaks from tests were banned only on test serwers not on main server, at least that was the penalty written in rules if I remember right). Heh, server them right though :P It's not that hard to get on test and check stuff by oneself anyway.

__Joff__ #25 Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:47 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 24
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    10-21-2011
Sigh... Some people never learn... While idiots are leaking the game, respectful players are still here spamming their f5 button. The devs were right to ban those fools.

This is my plane, there are many like it but this one is mine...


Drakenkorin #26 Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:56 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Alpha Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
It's good to know that people like that get punished, others will probably think twice before breaking the NDA now.
Speaking about NDA
http://eu.worldofwarplanes.com/en/nda

<Grammar nazi mode>
isn't point 10 misspelt?
10.    ACNOWLEGEMENT.
should be ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, shouldn't it?
</Grammar nazi mode>

Well that's about as much as I can do when it comes to reporting 'bugs' without an alpha access, hope to get a mail soon :)

ABLE0815 #27 Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:56 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 74
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postcsandazoltan, on 29 February 2012 - 04:44 PM, said:

[...]

About your post: you substituded one not known date with an another, we have no knowledge about the game development, according to the NDA... Especially I don't have a clue about what do you mean by "new build"

[...]

build refers to the process of converting source code files into standalone artifact(s) (like an *.exe) ... so maybe they are bringing WoWP from version 0.0.2 alpha to 0.0.3 alpha  :Smile_izmena:

csandazoltan #28 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:07 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 205 battles
  • 155
  • [FOHU] FOHU
  • Member since:
    10-31-2011

View PostABLE0815, on 29 February 2012 - 04:56 PM, said:

build refers to the process of converting source code files into standalone artifact(s) (like an *.exe) ... so maybe they are bringing WoWP from version 0.0.2 alpha to 0.0.3 alpha  :Smile_izmena:

Thank you ABLE0815... You were able to explain it to me...  :Smile_trollface:

I know what is the technical term for "build" (I'm an IT system manager) i was trying to imply that we do not know anything ABOUT the build, especially any dates...


It is so good to be a Commander of a clan


darkWolfcz #29 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:09 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Alpha Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
needs harder check to keep children away from serious stuff like alpha testing, sadly with internet all around, answers on questions within application are way too easy to find for anyone

CANN0N_F0DD3R #30 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:09 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 2
  • [B-S-A] B-S-A
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostJust1ce, on 29 February 2012 - 03:31 PM, said:

I second that!

i'll third that  :Smile_kamikaze:

ABLE0815 #31 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:12 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 74
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postcsandazoltan, on 29 February 2012 - 05:07 PM, said:

Thank you ABLE0815... You were able to explain it to me...  :Smile_trollface:

I know what is the technical term for "build" (I'm an IT system manager) i was trying to imply that we do not know anything ABOUT the build, especially any dates...

Ok, sorry. A lot of "nerds" hanging around here  :Smile_trollface: (I'm a developer now studying business information systems)

csandazoltan #32 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:16 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 205 battles
  • 155
  • [FOHU] FOHU
  • Member since:
    10-31-2011

View Postrtmijo12, on 29 February 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:

i'll third that  :Smile_kamikaze:

Fourth... How can is this go...  :Smile_trollface:

View PostABLE0815, on 29 February 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

Ok, sorry. A lot of "nerds" hanging around here  :Smile_trollface: (I'm a developer now studying business information systems)

It is finally go to see some competent computer "Wrenchman"  :Smile-_tongue:


It is so good to be a Commander of a clan


poolk #33 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:23 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Quote

"blocked in both World of Warplanes and World of Tanks "

Why the lock is in both games, if regulations had been broken in aircraft ?

shnbwmn #34 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:26 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Senior Alpha Test Veteran
  • 0 battles
  • 1,235
  • Member since:
    10-19-2011

View Postpoolk, on 29 February 2012 - 05:23 PM, said:

Why the lock is in both games, if regulations had been broken in aircraft ?
Even more reason to not break the NDA. WG is making the punishment as harsh as possible to deter leakers.

Ask and I'll try to help you | Signatures

csandazoltan #35 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:29 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 205 battles
  • 155
  • [FOHU] FOHU
  • Member since:
    10-31-2011

View Postpoolk, on 29 February 2012 - 05:23 PM, said:

Why the lock is in both games, if regulations had been broken in aircraft ?

Because it is serious offence to leak information about enclosed games...

They "agreed" to the NDA, i think it is an adequate punishment for unlawful conduct...

The WG could lose serious money because of this leaks...

This is marketing... Just look on the forum, thousands and thousands "hungry" people awaiting for some information... and we are aroused by the official pictures and can't wait for acceptance...


It is so good to be a Commander of a clan


Jazka #36 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:32 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 44
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
Yea WG would go way too easy on them by only preventing access to WoWp  :Smile_sad:

"Alea iacta est"


csandazoltan #37 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:42 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 205 battles
  • 155
  • [FOHU] FOHU
  • Member since:
    10-31-2011

View PostJazka, on 29 February 2012 - 05:32 PM, said:

Yea WG would go way too easy on them by only preventing access to WoWp  :Smile_sad:

Wrong... their WoT accounts are disabled too...

I don't know certainly that the WG is pressing legal charges against them...


It is so good to be a Commander of a clan


schr0d1nger #38 Posted 29 February 2012 - 05:59 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Military Reserve
  • 0 battles
  • 44
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostDrakenkorin, on 29 February 2012 - 04:56 PM, said:

It's good to know that people like that get punished, others will probably think twice before breaking the NDA now.
Speaking about NDA
http://eu.worldofwarplanes.com/en/nda

<Grammar nazi mode>
isn't point 10 misspelt?
10.    ACNOWLEGEMENT.
should be ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, shouldn't it?
</Grammar nazi mode>

Well that's about as much as I can do when it comes to reporting 'bugs' without an alpha access, hope to get a mail soon :)

Thanks, mate!
Corrected ;)

Glovasi #39 Posted 29 February 2012 - 06:00 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Quote

Fourth... How can is this go... :Smile_trollface:

Fifth  :Smile-_tongue:

I'm sitting here with plenty of times, an unused X52 and 10 years il2 Sturmovik online war experience.. and waiting for the mail..

While these bastards can't handle themselves. I hope my success will increase soon.

V.4_Glo ready for takeoff! :Smile_glasses:
There are no atheists on a burning plane..

blee0099 #40 Posted 29 February 2012 - 06:13 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    02-29-2012
Posted Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users