Main page

Warenwolf, on 29 February 2012 - 04:32 PM, said:

Do not worry. MadCatMkII is a second acc of DarkCybrid. I know it of course.  

And we have the next one who will be banned for leaking pictures

BAN THEM ALL  

serious investigations going on here ... so while waiting for mail i'm playing a round of L.A. Noire  

And the Banhammer swings again! Well done Guys  

No wonder. You let into alpha people out of nowhere, with very little or zero experience in WoT, and dedicated, active players like me and many, many others have to wait in line... That's... just not fair.  

Storm87, on 29 February 2012 - 07:40 PM, said:

Agreed... oh very much agreed!!!!

Do I have permission to shoot them   ?

SixtyNineD, on 29 February 2012 - 07:45 PM, said:

I'm not talking about senior alpha testers like you. I'm talking about many of these recently accepted, "green ones". What actually makes them so special and reliable? Experience in WoT? No. Forum activity? No. Who are these guys, anyway?  

Storm87, on 29 February 2012 - 07:54 PM, said:

I have looked up the people whos writed "I'm in" or something like that... 90% of them not played WoT or only have few hundred battles...
Not fair...

I've invested into wot a lot of money, awesome game they deserve the money, but this selection process is getting really annoying...

A dedicated WoT/airplane simulation player that has sent his application 1 week ago does not get any chance getting in...

(Oh well, I've never been lucky in those kind of things anyway)...


But surprisingly, bad apples... are always favorized...

It's such a shame such people do get the opportunity to get in and cause troubles.

They probably didn't even read or understand the Non-disclosure agreement.

Sigh...the world must be cruel after all...

we should start cult of banhammer  

Deadshade, on 29 February 2012 - 08:01 PM, said:

We should give Thor the BanHammer

csandazoltan, on 29 February 2012 - 07:57 PM, said:

This game is not only for WoT players, its also for flight enthusiasts who do not like WoT. And those should have a chance to test the game to.

Just because u spend money in WoT should not mean u have more chance of getting into GAT then any other person.


Besides, the battles they have on there WoT accounts is not little.
gaszekPL         6411
Starick [ROTA]         11393
DarkCybrid [FP]         4024

Storm87, on 29 February 2012 - 07:40 PM, said:

Interestingly enough that all three offenders (not counting one alt account) was WoT veterans. If you check their  stats ( on NA server) you will see that all of them had 6k+ battles, tier IX and X vehicles, Lowes etc.

vizier, on 29 February 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I do not want special treatment because i played WoT or spent money on it...
In my oppinion playing WoT could be beneficial because they are more familiar with WG development... We could see what a new player would not...

MrBabai, on 29 February 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

Agree

I interests now - Who is that "Phantom". Anybody knows ?

They were foolish thats true but i think their permanent WoT-ban was way too harsh. Everybody nods here on the forums, but if they had played 10k battles on WoT, and they had bought garage slots, prem tanks, prem consumables, and then suddenly all these were taken away from them, they wouldn't be so coincident. 1-2 maybe 3 months of WoT ban + some WoWP restrictions would had been enough. Im sure they haven't done it on purpose, they made a mistake, dont we all?

And now you might as well post my post down, somebody must stand up for those guyz!

We do not need to stand up...

They agreed to NDA, they broke the rules and they have to bear the punishment...

Grabarzstg, on 29 February 2012 - 08:17 PM, said:

GaszekPL (nickname on screenshot). Already banned.  

Quote

Why not? I paid alot of cash for development of this game.    My contribution should be honoured.    It's called "the justice".

EDIT:

Quote

Well, WG want to show they do not f*** around with NDA rulebreakers.    Banhammer hit'em hard, just to make an example. Who will dare to make some more leaks, now?  

AnFionn, on 29 February 2012 - 08:32 PM, said:

I understand that some of us think it's too harsh to perma-ban people who have played more than 10k matches and bought gold but it's still not right to leak information and get away "too easily" (everyone has own opinions what is "too easily"). They signed (and hopefully understood) not to spread their knowledge of alpha and now they paid the ultimate price (dont know if WG makes more moves towards leakers than perma-banning them)