Jump to content


Clan Wars Feedback


  • Please log in to reply
105 replies to this topic

MrConway #1 Posted 05 November 2015 - 08:35 AM

    Community Coordinator

  • WG Staff
  • 93 battles
  • 26
  • [CIRC] CIRC
  • Member since:
    10-03-2013
Please leave feedback regarding the new player-run clan wars campaign here!

twitterqxkfa.pngfacebook65yzk.pngyoutube1nk0c.png


Mc_Ramy13 #2 Posted 05 November 2015 - 06:45 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 4998 battles
  • 1,494
  • Member since:
    08-17-2013

View PostMrConway, on 05 November 2015 - 09:35 AM, said:

Please leave feedback regarding the new player-run clan wars campaign here!

 

I think It could be better if the creators (community) starts this post not WG.

 

 


 

Luchar con honor o morir luchando

 


n0_f4k3 #3 Posted 06 November 2015 - 05:33 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 24162 battles
  • 455
  • [JFA] JFA
  • Member since:
    06-20-2012
Yeah,nice try!

It's not about
Win or lose
Because we all lose
When they feed on the souls of the innocent
Blood-drenched pavement
Keep on moving though the waters stay raging


 


_MrPig_ #4 Posted 06 November 2015 - 07:17 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 19001 battles
  • 658
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013

View PostMc_Ramy13, on 05 November 2015 - 06:45 PM, said:

I think It could be better if the creators (community) starts this post not WG.

 

If all the support WG gives for this CW is opening a forum thread, this is really embarassing.



maxram68 #5 Posted 06 November 2015 - 07:31 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 24836 battles
  • 496
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View PostRRieder, on 06 November 2015 - 09:17 AM, said:

 

If all the support WG gives for this CW is opening a forum thread, this is really embarassing.

 

Certainly.

 They can at least pretend they're contributing...or something...



Kane591 #6 Posted 06 November 2015 - 08:05 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 12296 battles
  • 712
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Roooooo LOL 

 

Don't be so wicked :D

 

This thread is opened cause i asked to WG to do. They rename the Clan War part and create a thread to have your feedback. I didn't do it myself cause just wanted that it done correctly. I understand your disapointment.


Edited by Kane591, 06 November 2015 - 09:27 AM.


maxram68 #7 Posted 06 November 2015 - 10:25 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 24836 battles
  • 496
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View PostKane591, on 06 November 2015 - 10:05 AM, said:

 

Don't be so wicked :D

 

This thread is opened cause i asked to WG to do. They rename the Clan War part and create a thread to have your feedback...

 

Sorry - some of us are DAFT :rolleyes:

 

We're just a bit disappointed by the missing involvement by WG in clan wars so far - I'm sure we're not the only ones with that opinion.

 

In fact, active/ongoing clan wars could be a win-win for all (WG and players): Players gets a very intense and interesting "mode" of battle, and WG gets something that can be used to promote the game. Besides: It gives the clans something to do together.

 

Promotion of WoWp has never been high on the tasklist ín the WG-bunker, I guess....

 

 

 

 



jakub_czyli_ja #8 Posted 08 November 2015 - 11:02 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Conquest Member
  • 19245 battles
  • 7,839
  • [XII-2] XII-2
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postmaxram68, on 06 November 2015 - 10:25 AM, said:

We're just a bit disappointed by the missing involvement by WG in clan wars so far - I'm sure we're not the only ones with that opinion.

Now it's better.


Clear cache/Skasuj cache: cmd /K del /Q /F /S "%TEMP%\wargaming.net\wowp\cache"

 

And everything else/i wszystko inne: cmd /K del /Q /F /S "%APPDATA%\Wargaming.net\World of Warplanes"


Mc_Ramy13 #9 Posted 12 November 2015 - 11:20 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 4998 battles
  • 1,494
  • Member since:
    08-17-2013

View Postmaxram68, on 06 November 2015 - 11:25 AM, said:

Promotion of WoWp has never been high on the tasklist ín the WG-bunker, I guess....

 

WOWP promotion?

 

[ironic_mode_on] yeah! they spent a lot of money a few days ago to promote Wowp :D because of this we can see a lot of new players witch clan's name is BOT'S. The future of Wowp is solved now ;) [ironic_mode_off]

 

View Postmaxram68, on 06 November 2015 - 11:25 AM, said:

 

We're just a bit disappointed by the missing involvement by WG in clan wars so far - I'm sure we're not the only ones with that opinion.

 

In fact, active/ongoing clan wars could be a win-win for all (WG and players): Players gets a very intense and interesting "mode" of battle, and WG gets something that can be used to promote the game. Besides: It gives the clans something to do together.

 

and yes, not only DAFT players are a bit disappointed. It is like: "here you are players, we fucked the game with training rooms bug  and now we prefer to promote Wows. If you want CW, please, re-organize (community) it and we will send you some premium planes to support it".

 

Our european community are just amazing. This CW are incredible :teethhappy: (the new map is awsome, TY for all your job 1EF :D:medal:) but we have not enought players to participate becouse of the new BOT'S clan have an 90% of wowp actually players :izmena: (damm it, they will win CW).

 

Anyway, let's wait for 2.0 update. At least there are about 1000 players who love this game and fight for it every day, every minute, and every € spent.


Edited by Mc_Ramy13, 12 November 2015 - 12:25 PM.

 

Luchar con honor o morir luchando

 


Kane591 #10 Posted 12 November 2015 - 01:21 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 12296 battles
  • 712
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

@Mc Ramy: I'm sorry for that, maybe you will come next weeks ^^

 

Ok after this first week, if you can and if you have, please tell us some reports. During this week, we correct some small bugs and changed some rules quickly cause some situation could very difficult to manage.

 

We have to add some thing again but i think it will all and rules will be stay like it is today. 

 

Thx a lot for participants.

 

Best regards.


Edited by Kane591, 12 November 2015 - 01:43 PM.


Mc_Ramy13 #11 Posted 12 November 2015 - 01:27 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 4998 battles
  • 1,494
  • Member since:
    08-17-2013

View PostKane591, on 12 November 2015 - 02:21 PM, said:

@Mc Ramy: I'm sorry for that, maybe you will come next weeks ^^

 

 

BIG THANKS (IN CAPITAL) to you and your clan for bring us Clan Wars but, i think we won't participate. (It is true that we have a lot of members but not active in Wowp couse all the mistakes.)

 

If we could could participate I'll talk with you.

 

Good luck to all clans and best wishes :D


Edited by Mc_Ramy13, 12 November 2015 - 01:30 PM.

 

Luchar con honor o morir luchando

 


Kane591 #12 Posted 12 November 2015 - 09:28 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 12296 battles
  • 712
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
There was a problem with confirm page with screenshots. Problem solved.

Zinok #13 Posted 23 November 2015 - 09:04 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 15343 battles
  • 112
  • [FKISS] FKISS
  • Member since:
    11-23-2013
Hi all.
@Kane
I don't understand the new rules for ban: "1 plane for 1 model
Alowed to have 2 plane of one model wich be different that the others".

Same model but different?


Kane591 #14 Posted 23 November 2015 - 09:22 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 12296 battles
  • 712
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Hi Zinok.

 

You have to select one model which is different than others models and you can have 2 planes of this model.



Zinok #15 Posted 23 November 2015 - 09:52 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 15343 battles
  • 112
  • [FKISS] FKISS
  • Member since:
    11-23-2013
If i understand corectly.  
2 plane ban (bf109g and i220)
I can play with: 2 P51D , 2 spit IX, 2 la7, 1 bf 109Z and 1 F7F
That good?


Inginier #16 Posted 23 November 2015 - 01:11 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 18017 battles
  • 266
  • [SPX] SPX
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

I think it's more like "at least 7 different planes (models)" and you can use one plane model max. twice (except of HF),

so for example: 2 planes ban (bf109g and i220) and you can use: 2x P-51D, 1x spit IX, 1x La-7, 1x Meteor, 1x Yak 3, 1x 109 Z and 1x F7F.

but I am also not exactly sure.



Kane591 #17 Posted 23 November 2015 - 02:54 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 12296 battles
  • 712
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Hi so a small example can give you more view:

 

The rule is: 

 

Ban 1 model for each team.

1 plane per model

Exception to select 2 plane for 1 model.

 

So:

 

Team ban 1 model, it can be 2 model or only one if same model selected.

Each team have to present only one plane per model.

But exception: For ONLY one model, which is different than other 1 for 1, you can take 2 planes for this.

 

Example:

Excepted the ban, team select these follow planes:

 

1 Yak, 1 Spit, 1 La, 2 P40, 1 Fw, 1 Me 410, 1 P38J. 

 

In this example Bf 109 is banned by both team. So this team select one plane per model but for the exception, select 2 plane for one model, which is different than other. And not possible for Heavies.

 

I think i have to be more explain for this part of rule.



Adamorr #18 Posted 23 November 2015 - 02:58 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 32062 battles
  • 260
  • [_UN_] _UN_
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

With battle without ban rules old rules still valid?  One plane per model?



Kane591 #19 Posted 23 November 2015 - 03:21 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 12296 battles
  • 712
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
Hello, yes there is no change for this rule.

Zinok #20 Posted 23 November 2015 - 03:58 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 15343 battles
  • 112
  • [FKISS] FKISS
  • Member since:
    11-23-2013
Ok i understand.  Thx for all





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users