Jump to content


Poll about your experience with bots of the last few weeks

bot

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

Poll: Bot poll (43 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 10 battles in order to participate this poll.

Bot numbers should be like

  1. In patch 1.9.1 (less) (5 votes [11.63%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.63%

  2. In patch 1.9.0 (more) (35 votes [81.40%])

    Percentage of vote: 81.40%

  3. Something else (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. There should be no bots at all (3 votes [6.98%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.98%

Bot skill should be like

  1. In patch 1.9.1 (dumber) (10 votes [23.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.26%

  2. In patch 1.9.0 (smarter) (24 votes [55.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 55.81%

  3. Something else (6 votes [13.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.95%

  4. There should be no bots at all (3 votes [6.98%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.98%

Vote Hide poll

BrushWolf2 #21 Posted 19 November 2015 - 03:53 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 0 battles
  • 223
  • Member since:
    11-22-2014

View PostCheefCoach, on 18 November 2015 - 09:41 PM, said:

Some bots should be genius, some should be idiots, and most should be something between. If there is more genius players, there should be more genius bots. And game should have as near to 15 vs 15 as possible. 

 

I don't really notice difference between bots and player in most cases. 

 

While a good idea we all know about the results from the 1.5/1.6 MM and its skill factor and the overly long waits some players got. The alternative which they are using of putting more level 2 and 3 bots in the higher tier matches and more level 1 bots in the lower tiers will have to suffice.

 

 


_Stealth_Hunter_ #22 Posted 19 November 2015 - 10:29 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Advanced Member
  • 53 battles
  • 2,350
  • Member since:
    05-05-2012

Number of bots in battles seems to have increased again.

 

I guess WG can listen once in a while.


#BotLivesMatter

 

Old signature now in accordance to standards passed by our new robotic overlords

 


jrt5 #23 Posted 20 November 2015 - 05:08 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 2 battles
  • 172
  • [KZO] KZO
  • Member since:
    02-25-2013

Yes, I tried it at 6 am and with one human player on each side the battle was 10v10.

 

Thank you WG. I can play again.



dreambill #24 Posted 20 November 2015 - 10:27 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 239 battles
  • 229
  • [GR-12] GR-12
  • Member since:
    07-25-2013

I found the bots of 1.9 (previous) version more challenging, in their way of flying, but keep their long range accuracy to the 1.91 (current) version standards.

These 1 shot critical damage from 800 meters below was ridiculous.

As for the number of them, I'll stuck in the middle. I'd like at least 10vs10 battles (current 7vs7 when only 2 humans is a little bit empty for me)

GA bots must defend themselves more aggressively when being attacked, they are sitting ducks as they are now.



BrushWolf2 #25 Posted 22 November 2015 - 08:37 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 0 battles
  • 223
  • Member since:
    11-22-2014

View Post_Stealth_Hunter_, on 19 November 2015 - 05:29 PM, said:

Number of bots in battles seems to have increased again.

 

I guess WG can listen once in a while.

 

Yeah, the minimum now seems to be 10 vs 10 bots & humans. There is a definite difference in how this patch has been deployed than in previous ones. The communication still stinks if you don't read Russian but any improvement is welcome. I still find it rather ironic that the server that sees the fewest number of bots is the one that complained more about them.

 

View Postdreambill, on 20 November 2015 - 05:27 AM, said:

I found the bots of 1.9 (previous) version more challenging, in their way of flying, but keep their long range accuracy to the 1.91 (current) version standards.

These 1 shot critical damage from 800 meters below was ridiculous.

As for the number of them, I'll stuck in the middle. I'd like at least 10vs10 battles (current 7vs7 when only 2 humans is a little bit empty for me)

GA bots must defend themselves more aggressively when being attacked, they are sitting ducks as they are now.

 

I don't know if it is really that the bots are dumber now or that we as players are getting better at dealing with them. I agree that the GA bots need to be more aggressive on defense but what I think they need to do better is take out the AA that is firing at them first.

 

 


SawnOffLockie #26 Posted 25 November 2015 - 10:09 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 2 battles
  • 44
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    04-04-2014

GA Bots also break off their attack too early, and then spend aeons turning round to make another attack run.

 

I watched a GA attacking GTs the other day, and I'm sure that whole new species of life had time to evolve, flourish and go extinct in the time it took the GA Bot to turn and carry on its attack. ;-)


Edited by SawnOffLockie, 25 November 2015 - 10:10 AM.






Also tagged with bot

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users