Jump to content


Map questions


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

zwer1982 #1 Posted 14 March 2016 - 07:36 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 6 battles
  • 299
  • [P___E] P___E
  • Member since:
    12-04-2013
Cant attack Montenegro from Serbia. Is this somekind bug or what?

Kane591 #2 Posted 14 March 2016 - 08:01 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 453 battles
  • 865
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Hi zwer.

 

It's a bug. You can find information about it on CW news, on the website. I listed territories which bug is applied..... I work about it.



zwer1982 #3 Posted 14 March 2016 - 08:05 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 6 battles
  • 299
  • [P___E] P___E
  • Member since:
    12-04-2013
Ok, So can you mark Montenegro as our attack ?

Kane591 #4 Posted 14 March 2016 - 08:43 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 453 battles
  • 865
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

The problems are solved.

 

You can now attack territories ! Please get the complete information on website.

 

Thanks a lot :)



Inginier #5 Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:06 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 74 battles
  • 280
  • [SPX] SPX
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

"For teams which where on the last season. you can only attack territories which are next to yours."

Well I have also an option to attack territories which are not only next to ours. I think it's because the one old rule is still active: "A permission will be give to attack a territory on a zone where clan has not a territory even if this clan has a territory on the other zone." So is this rule still valid or it's a mistake?

 

Another question. During the 1st. Season, there was one map which was at that time not available in the training room - the map "Bay". And it is available now. Could it be added to the CW map maybe as a new territory? If not now, then maybe in next Season?



LORDDOOMSDAY #6 Posted 14 March 2016 - 10:29 AM

    First Lieutenant

  • Conquest Member
  • 10 battles
  • 2,700
  • [_UN_] _UN_
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012
"For teams which where on the last season. you can only attack territories which are next to yours." - STILL BUGGY :trollface:!!!!

UNFORGIVEN CEO

 Kings of the Baltic


Kane591 #7 Posted 14 March 2016 - 10:33 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 453 battles
  • 865
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Hi mates.

 

This rule: "A permission will be give to attack a territory on a zone where clan has not a territory even if this clan has a territory on the other zone."

is running, like the last season and begins this first week.

 

@Lord

Why do you say that it's buggy, a problem for you with the map?

 



Kane591 #8 Posted 14 March 2016 - 02:12 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 453 battles
  • 865
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

For the map "Bay", i will distribute maps again for the territories.

On first season, i took the map list and I applied in order. I will do same but include "Bay" in the list.

 

I think there are no errors on the map now. I added a thing that you can declare attack or Cancel this directly on the map. You have just to click on territory logo.

 

Best regards. 


Edited by Kane591, 14 March 2016 - 02:12 PM.


PiotrSzut #9 Posted 14 March 2016 - 05:18 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 45 battles
  • 449
  • [FKISS] FKISS
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

sorry i speak in french for kane ;)

@kane

"For teams which where on the last season. you can only attack territories which are next to yours."

il semble que l on peut attaquer d autres territoires qui ne soient pas a coté du notre et du meme coté de la carte... il doit y avoir un bug ?



Kane591 #10 Posted 14 March 2016 - 05:23 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 453 battles
  • 865
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

J'ai corrigé l'erreur Piotr. Le nouveau bouton Buggait. Vous pouvez attaquer les territoires qui sont dans l'autre zone.

 

Piotr said that teams could attack territories even if they are not next to their place. You can attack in the other zone like yours. And there was a bug caused by the new button. I saw one team found this bug and attack a territory they couldn't attack.

 

I will send a message to ask to this team to change herself. Or maybe change it now?

 

Thanks and sorry for bugs, i try to correct it as fast as i can. 

 

Best regards.



KGNico22 #11 Posted 15 March 2016 - 10:56 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 655 battles
  • 733
  • [1OFF1] 1OFF1
  • Member since:
    09-03-2012

hi all

 

la suisse est bugué

 

mp envoyer a kane

 

dsl de prévenir si tard et pour le français

 

[édit] Cant attack Suisse from France

The problem is solved

 

Thanks Kane

 


Edited by KGNico22, 16 March 2016 - 11:51 PM.


Adamorr #12 Posted 28 March 2016 - 07:56 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 170 battles
  • 268
  • [_UN_] _UN_
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013
Our clan have Italy. We cannot attack France from Italy- is this correct?

Kane591 #13 Posted 28 March 2016 - 08:25 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 453 battles
  • 865
  • [1EF] 1EF
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Hi Adamorr.

 

It was a missing and now it's solved.

 

Thanks for report.



Adamorr #14 Posted 05 April 2016 - 07:43 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 170 battles
  • 268
  • [_UN_] _UN_
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

Hi, This week is possible to situation attack each others same time- Italy and Switzerland.

Previous season there were a rules"

Rules

Précision about situation:

If 2 teams attack each other in the same time
For example: 
Team A attack Terrotory B ( TB ) which owner is Team B.
Team B attack Terrotory A ( TA ) which owner is Team A.
The two teams have to choose where they want to fight. You have to remember that  Team can't be on two place in the same time. So for example
Fight A vs B on TA, A can't be on TB cause in TA, so B keep the territory by default and A and B fight on TA. 
It's not possible to exchange territories between Teams.
The attacked territory have to be selected before the scheduled time ( for example before 21:00 ).
The team that has the least territory of both teams takes precedence over choice of attacked territory."
 
Are these rules still valid?
Choosing the territory can be problem  if both teams keeps his  opinion.
Mayby rules - owner territory with lower/higher tier choosing ?
 
 
 


zwer1982 #15 Posted 05 April 2016 - 12:06 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 6 battles
  • 299
  • [P___E] P___E
  • Member since:
    12-04-2013

i dont see problem...

 

If you have enough players  for both battles you can play both....

Land without defend its automatically yours ( valid ss ) and land with battle takes winner...


Edited by zwer1982, 05 April 2016 - 12:09 PM.


Adamorr #16 Posted 05 April 2016 - 12:24 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 170 battles
  • 268
  • [_UN_] _UN_
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

I dont see problems- I see rules. Is still valid or not. And try imagine jumping between open training rooms for battles...Where oponent is present, how many players..And decision- defend or attack,

 


Edited by Adamorr, 05 April 2016 - 12:26 PM.


zwer1982 #17 Posted 05 April 2016 - 12:47 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 6 battles
  • 299
  • [P___E] P___E
  • Member since:
    12-04-2013

been there done that....

 

We often had attack on 2 ladns same time...  Form 2 squads and give them lands to defend or attack.... No problem if you have enough players....



Adamorr #18 Posted 05 April 2016 - 01:54 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 170 battles
  • 268
  • [_UN_] _UN_
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

I think that you dont understand my question. Mayby I wrote it in bad way.

Look at the map - Italy and Switzerland. Do you have same situation?

 


Edited by Adamorr, 05 April 2016 - 01:55 PM.


maxram68 #19 Posted 05 April 2016 - 02:56 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 0 battles
  • 515
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View PostAdamorr, on 05 April 2016 - 03:54 PM, said:

I think that you dont understand my question. Mayby I wrote it in bad way.

Look at the map - Italy and Switzerland. Do you have same situation?

 

 

Last season, we (DAFT), had battles for two territories next to eachother on the map -  not Italy and Switzerland, but two others.

We attacked our neighbour, and our neighbour attacked us - clearly a "team A vs. B" and "B vs. A" situation - battles were also scheduled at the same time according to the CW-map.

 

We thought we just had to fight for _one_ territory: the territory we attacked, since the opponent agreed & showed up for battle there.

However, the opponent had _two_ crews available: one for defence (against us) and the other was apparently used for attacking our territory (wait 3mins, screenshot, done).

We ended up losing our own territory without being able to defend it - and also lost the battle for the territory we attacked.

 

It does not matter anymore who the opponent was - and just to be 100% clear: there are no hard feelings about it in DAFT (anymore) - but we actually felt like we got robbed of one territory.

Especially since we also had fewer territories, and according to the rule could pick in which territory to fight.

 

It seems like NOT enforcing this rule, gives bigger clans with pilots enough for 2 or even 3 crews available for CW a big advantage in those situations.

 

So - just like Adamorr - I'm also curious about the exact interpretation of the rule above.

 



Adamorr #20 Posted 05 April 2016 - 03:05 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 170 battles
  • 268
  • [_UN_] _UN_
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

maxram68 - thank You.

Hope we got it this evening.

 


Edited by Adamorr, 05 April 2016 - 03:21 PM.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users