Jump to content


Hedgehopper Tournament: Discussion

discussion feedback tournament

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

Necropsittacus #21 Posted 01 March 2017 - 08:04 PM

    Testpilot

  • Community Contributor
  • 8953 battles
  • 1,935
  • [JFA] JFA
  • Member since:
    08-31-2012
Since we have 13 teams now, we can play the tournament in double elimination mode. Each team will get to play at least two matches...! :great:

Death from Above Member


Necropsittacus #22 Posted 01 March 2017 - 09:27 PM

    Testpilot

  • Community Contributor
  • 8953 battles
  • 1,935
  • [JFA] JFA
  • Member since:
    08-31-2012

View PostGrolim, on 28 February 2017 - 02:46 AM, said:

Thank you for your patience creating this event for us players. Not many can appreciate the effort you have put into this to make it happen.

One thing that could be better, imho, would be if we use only BO3 through out the tournament. Finals with 2xBO5 are a lengthy business...quite boring actually.

 

I think this is a good point. I remember such 2xBO5 event... that dragged on for hours. Well, I made a poll about it: http://forum.worldofwarplanes.eu/index.php?/topic/47201-finals-bo3-or-bo5/

 


Death from Above Member


King_ExtincE #23 Posted 01 March 2017 - 11:49 PM

    You mad brah?

  • Conquest Member
  • 5806 battles
  • 4,346
  • [-DFA-] -DFA-
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostNecropsittacus, on 01 March 2017 - 10:27 PM, said:

 

I think this is a good point. I remember such 2xBO5 event... that dragged on for hours. Well, I made a poll about it: http://forum.worldofwarplanes.eu/index.php?/topic/47201-finals-bo3-or-bo5/

 

 

That depends.. If the finals get their own playday I'd personally wouldn't mind a BO5. I'd keep any 3rd place game a BO3 tho, if there will be one. Nvm, just saw the schedule, bo3 if you ask me :)

Edited by King_ExtincE, 02 March 2017 - 12:24 AM.

                                                                                                                

maxram68 #24 Posted 04 March 2017 - 08:01 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 24908 battles
  • 496
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

After we got eradicated from the tournament, I'll just leave a quick message on behalf of my team saying Thanks for setting up this tournament!

It was great fun to participate, and the structure as well as the planes to use made it very interesting.

 



Necropsittacus #25 Posted 05 March 2017 - 02:40 AM

    Testpilot

  • Community Contributor
  • 8953 battles
  • 1,935
  • [JFA] JFA
  • Member since:
    08-31-2012
Thanks for your participation and for your feedback!
Everybody else is invited to leave their feedback in this thread, too. :honoring:

Edited by Necropsittacus, 05 March 2017 - 02:40 AM.

Death from Above Member


_MrPig_ #26 Posted 06 March 2017 - 07:37 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 19124 battles
  • 662
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013
I would like to confirm what my beloved and inspiring leader maxram68 said. Especially the altitude limit makes battles more interesting. Thank you guys!

Adamorr #27 Posted 06 March 2017 - 08:57 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 32145 battles
  • 260
  • [_UN_] _UN_
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

Congratulation for a winners!

Thanks for making this tournament - we had great fun- pls more:)



0berhessen #28 Posted 07 March 2017 - 08:16 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 12608 battles
  • 74
  • [JG26] JG26
  • Member since:
    06-27-2016
In the name of my Team, the RG52 aka JG52, thank you very much for your effort to set up this tournament! We had great fun to participate and we are looking forward for the coming events. Congratulations to the winners!

eekeeboo #29 Posted 09 March 2017 - 03:24 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 12687 battles
  • 447
  • [JFA] JFA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Wanted to add my own thanks to Necro and WG for the hard work and well organised tournament. I of course greatly approve of the booty and my ever increasing smaug pile pleases me greatly. 

 

I look forward to the next one (hopefully not too far away) and I look forward to repaying Splonge for his pre-emptive revenge. 



Cheaterhater #30 Posted 09 March 2017 - 04:04 AM

    Testpilot

  • Squadron Leader
  • 9943 battles
  • 2,017
  • [JFA] JFA
  • Member since:
    08-19-2012

View Posteekeeboo, on 09 March 2017 - 04:24 AM, said:

I of course greatly approve of the booty

 

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

 

Me too man, me too...


Edited by Cheaterhater, 09 March 2017 - 04:08 AM.

Make World of Warplanes great again!

jeff_peters #31 Posted 10 March 2017 - 10:09 AM

    Wicked

  • Conquest Member
  • 10462 battles
  • 3,182
  • [JFA] JFA
  • Member since:
    12-29-2011

View Posteekeeboo, on 09 March 2017 - 04:24 AM, said:

Wanted to add my own thanks to Necro and WG for the hard work and well organised tournament. I of course greatly approve of the booty and my ever increasing smaug pile pleases me greatly. 

 

I look forward to the next one (hopefully not too far away) and I look forward to repaying Splonge for his pre-emptive revenge. 

 

View PostCheaterhater, on 09 March 2017 - 05:04 AM, said:

 

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

 

Me too man, me too...

 

So we are going to have two Seafangs next time? Good.

 

But srsly, Necro rocks.


 

DfA cannon fodder


HansGriger #32 Posted 10 March 2017 - 06:38 PM

    League Champion

  • Squadron Leader
  • 20394 battles
  • 529
  • [JFA] JFA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Nice job setting up the tournament Necro everything flowed smooothly:great: and nice Fighting all Teams it was a good tournament:playing: and we got a venom instead of a fourth in a row Heinkel.

Now im off to see what a grievous error the Britts did not adopting the weird sidewindow on all their fighters:honoring:              (would probably have increased spotting and awareness to alien level... :unsure:or not)







Also tagged with discussion, feedback, tournament

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users