Jump to content


Feedback Questionnaire - Conquest Mode


  • Please log in to reply
74 replies to this topic

jakub_czyli_ja #61 Posted 27 September 2017 - 05:02 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Conquest Member
  • 1389 battles
  • 9,028
  • [XII-2] XII-2
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postn0_f4k3, on 27 September 2017 - 06:59 AM, said:

Every word you type here is a waste of time. Its done ,and they dont care about your thoughts........

It isn't rue, they care. In their special way.

They care about enthusiastic answers, like:

 

Question: In your opinion, is the game spectacular?

 

Answer:

Some effects (new explosions) are spectacular, flying model is on the other part very bad and interface makes you very confused

They read:

effects are spectacular

 

Answer:

Yes but chaotic

They read:

Yes

 

Answer:

The game is very bad. The mode itself is ok but you really need to work over flight model. Use the flight mode that you have in game already and just add this mode to the game

They read:

is ok

 

Answer:

Yes, a spectacular fake ww2 game.

They read:

Yes.

 

And such answers will be forwarded to Minsk, to show how players are enthusiastic for new version, to save asses of people pushing WoWP 2.0 after the Fail.


Clear cache/Skasuj cache: cmd /K del /Q /F /S "%TEMP%\wargaming.net\wowp\cache"

 

And everything else/i wszystko inne: cmd /K del /Q /F /S "%APPDATA%\Wargaming.net\World of Warplanes"


Suppo4free #62 Posted 27 September 2017 - 05:22 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 1 battle
  • 798
  • [FKISS] FKISS
  • Member since:
    06-04-2014

View Postn0_f4k3, on 27 September 2017 - 06:59 AM, said:

Every word you type here is a waste of time. Its done ,and they dont care about your thoughts........

 

its not a test... its just a bad joke !

for sure, they dont care

 

remember, "Mrs WoWP Supertest" wrote this :

 

View PostPriolia, on 17 March 2017 - 02:23 PM, said:

We are grateful for your active participation in the closed testing session for the new Conquest game mode. We have analyzed your reports and feedback carefully........

 

Let’s begin with main positive ... moments that the players outlined during the test session.

 

Positives:

  • Players are very enthusiastic about the introduction of the new game mode.
  • Test participants have noted the great potential of it, ...
  • Overall atmosphere of an intensive aerial battle is achieved...

Edited by Suppo4free, 27 September 2017 - 11:50 PM.


Kr1s83 #63 Posted 08 October 2017 - 11:06 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 8 battles
  • 2
  • [DAFT] DAFT
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014
Oh no. These would be very bad conclusions by WG. The 2.0 is horrible and I will not play it.

maxram68 #64 Posted 08 October 2017 - 11:40 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 0 battles
  • 515
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View PostKr1s83, on 08 October 2017 - 12:06 PM, said:

Oh no. These would be very bad conclusions by WG. The 2.0 is horrible and I will not play it.

 

Not only bad, mate - they simply twisted the feedback to accommodate the point of view of whoever made the decision about 2.0.

 

I guess the "patch plan" for WoWp outlined in the interview with Wolfman approx. 1,5 year ago was taken off the table right after the camera was switched off...

 

Yes, 2.0 is horrible, - well...even "horrible" is a huge understatement...

 

 


Edited by maxram68, 08 October 2017 - 11:40 AM.


jakub_czyli_ja #65 Posted 08 October 2017 - 03:38 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Conquest Member
  • 1389 battles
  • 9,028
  • [XII-2] XII-2
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postmaxram68, on 08 October 2017 - 11:40 AM, said:

I guess the "patch plan" for WoWp outlined in the interview with Wolfman approx. 1,5 year ago was taken off the table right after the camera was switched off...

It looks like the very first thing he said that was to be dropped got a green light - a complete overhaul.


Clear cache/Skasuj cache: cmd /K del /Q /F /S "%TEMP%\wargaming.net\wowp\cache"

 

And everything else/i wszystko inne: cmd /K del /Q /F /S "%APPDATA%\Wargaming.net\World of Warplanes"


serbsproud_4c #66 Posted 08 October 2017 - 10:47 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 180 battles
  • 774
  • [4CAF] 4CAF
  • Member since:
    05-12-2012

View Postjakub_czyli_ja, on 08 October 2017 - 04:38 PM, said:

It looks like the very first thing he said that was to be dropped got a green light - a complete overhaul.

 

well even they plan a complete overhaul, i can`t belive WG think this result was the goal!!!

i talked to him last year @ gamescom and this 2.0 was 100% not that he promised to us!

 

http://forum.worldof...ic-testversion/

 



Suppo4free #67 Posted 09 October 2017 - 01:37 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 1 battle
  • 798
  • [FKISS] FKISS
  • Member since:
    06-04-2014

View Postserbsproud_4c, on 08 October 2017 - 10:47 PM, said:

 

well even they plan a complete overhaul, i can`t belive WG think this result was the goal!!!

i talked to him last year @ gamescom and this 2.0 was 100% not that he promised to us!

 

http://forum.worldof...ic-testversion/

 

 

its not an overhaul, its a regression

V2.0 = GAME OVER



HALL_OF_FAKE #68 Posted 09 October 2017 - 12:06 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 7 battles
  • 334
  • [DITO] DITO
  • Member since:
    05-17-2016

View PostSuppo4free, on 09 October 2017 - 01:37 AM, said:

 

its not an overhaul, its a regression

V2.0 = GAME OVER

 

i have nothing more to say

Join 2.0 Boycotters athttps://www.clandito.com

 

 


Grumpy_Guts #69 Posted 09 October 2017 - 12:30 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 3081 battles
  • 928
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012
Are they even interested ?

Raginhard #70 Posted 11 October 2017 - 11:16 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 536 battles
  • 28
  • [-PHX-] -PHX-
  • Member since:
    08-16-2014
Hey staff, pushing thread, above were precise answers about after testing unchanged issues we are facing again (2.0 being live).

fi3s7er #71 Posted 12 October 2017 - 06:14 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 498 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
This game mode for radom battles is awful, but if they make clan battels like in the WoT this mode will be good whit real ares, however for random battles the old game stile if beter. And if they leave the game like this the game will be realy OVER.

Mnemonick #72 Posted 14 October 2017 - 11:54 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 29 battles
  • 49
  • [D-302] D-302
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Give us our game back!!

This is unplayable!

You wanna make a new mode? OK, but let it be optional, not obligatory.

Give us our game back or 100 people from Squadron 302 will look for a new game.

regards



MartyJameson #73 Posted 23 October 2017 - 12:36 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 4 battles
  • 199
  • [GWDYS] GWDYS
  • Member since:
    09-23-2013

Give us back the OLD game. Thats just all for my general feedback!!! No further words. Version 2.0 is s*it

 

Yours Sincerely MartyJameson :honoring:



Pitulusu #74 Posted 21 November 2017 - 10:31 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1559 battles
  • 140
  • [S_FI] S_FI
  • Member since:
    10-17-2017
First win of the day with newly bought Me 265 and didn't register X2... what happened? only 4400xp for 12500 combat points and top grade 5 stars...

myllyjo #75 Posted 30 April 2018 - 04:34 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 16 battles
  • 2
  • [LLV24] LLV24
  • Member since:
    09-01-2013

The game is a BULLSHIT after the patch...

Can see that You are not even intrested,

Fine.... Won't play it anymore...Moved on to War Thunder






4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users