Jump to content


Version 2.0


  • Please log in to reply
574 replies to this topic

ElDefunes #181 Posted 12 October 2017 - 05:36 AM

    First Lieutenant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 65 battles
  • 2,345
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postn0_f4k3, on 12 October 2017 - 06:48 AM, said:

Will someone from WG response and tell us how its going on here?

I think its enough feedback now from our side! 

 

Wargaming cant response, because they still believe they would be great game developers.

That means all criticism can only come from noobs.

So 99% of all feedback about 2.0, and the testserver before, must come from noobs. You all. Me too.

And Wargaming dont discusses with noobs.


Turkish_TIG3R #182 Posted 12 October 2017 - 05:47 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Conquest Member
  • 22 battles
  • 31
  • [TIG3R] TIG3R
  • Member since:
    09-08-2013
No 2.0 wargame. You noob team wargame. we want our game back. this error must be returned as soon as possible. we worry when you do each development because it always gets worse. *Edited

Edited by Nohe21, 12 October 2017 - 08:51 AM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Mystique_X #183 Posted 12 October 2017 - 05:56 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 2 battles
  • 54
  • [COSTS] COSTS
  • Member since:
    08-17-2011

it also shows that WG NEVER checked and paid attention to our opinions posted in forum according to pre-test of Version 2.0.

If more than 70% of all players announced BEFORE RELEASE of 2.0 that they would leave immediately once implemented,

there must be some truth.

 

But well,,,,They delivered such crap, now they shall suffer in it.

 



serbsproud_4c #184 Posted 12 October 2017 - 06:35 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 165 battles
  • 751
  • [4CAF] 4CAF
  • Member since:
    05-12-2012

I tryed yesterday all Tiers and nothing has changed my view from the Public Test.

(Again thank you WG for no Information and therefore 20.000 free xp lost for birthdaybonus)

The Most Clan members plays 2—3 and quit.

they ask me somthing that i can‘t Unterstand (points...Win Ratio...etc).

but as i see we got 2 yes 2 WG—clans who are in the top 40.

i think there is something strange if WG play more then someone old wowp—clans :teethhappy::amazed::ohmy::hiding:



ArtyIsSuperior #185 Posted 12 October 2017 - 06:43 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 11 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    04-24-2017

View PostNohe21, on 11 October 2017 - 02:07 PM, said:

*Off Topic, incorrect language and inappropriate posts have been deleted.

 

Have a nice day.

 

did anyone in persha or wg ever asked themselves what inspired people to make "Off Topic, incorrect language and inappropriate posts"? Or is that too much intellectual challenge?

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=MO6RGMSbK8g

 

by the way, why don't you open 2,0 thread in "current update" section

looooool

rofl

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=2_f8v2Xd6wg

 

my first pc planes game. dos.

still more advanced than wowp 2.0.


 

Edited by ArtyIsSuperior, 12 October 2017 - 10:51 AM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to disrespectful comments and red text use.


houghtonbee #186 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:19 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 242 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    06-23-2013

View PostArtyIsSuperior, on 12 October 2017 - 07:04 AM, said:

https://www.youtube....h?v=2_f8v2Xd6wg

 

my first pc planes game. dos.

still more advanced than wowp 2.0.

 

​Mine as well, fantastic game years ahead of it's time, imagine that now with modern graphics!

skamber #187 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:23 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 3
  • [DITO] DITO
  • Member since:
    09-11-2013

Many good players left WOW ! :(

WOW will never be good again ! :sceptic:

But ok! not play wow,more time for life :)



HALL_OF_FAKE #188 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:24 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 7 battles
  • 334
  • [DITO] DITO
  • Member since:
    05-17-2016

View Postn0_f4k3, on 12 October 2017 - 04:48 AM, said:

Will someone from WG response and tell us how its going on here?

I think its enough feedback now from our side! 

Morning bro.. I am too old to adapt as they say

WoWP is dead...

Game uninstalled just visiting this forum from time to time ...I don't know miracles may happen... Hard to think that game we loved disappeared...

 


 


wlatopa #189 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:25 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 86 battles
  • 520
  • Member since:
    03-18-2014
unistalled.Bye all

Revan_Tiberius #190 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:29 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Beta Tester
  • 451 battles
  • 30
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
Must admit I am quite enjoying the change hehe, can not really see the issue with the update.  In all honesty if it gets more people into the game I wont complain too much.

_Poe #191 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:31 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 583 battles
  • 180
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

I got message from WG leaker.

I will post this to this community for reference.

World of Warplanes has been   sacrificed.


 

Game was barely profitable.


 However Wargaming decided to use existing resources of the game to make experiment, as they are pushing boundaries .

 

Explanation:


Wargaming is experimenting with integrating battlefield game (air. ground, sea), and first step, and the least risky was to do it starting with planes.


 There you are gentlemen  pilots (and former pilots), our  blowed game  is  victim , an old building destroyed  in order to bult newer one 10 x larger, sacrifice for the "greater good".

 

 


Edited by _Poe, 12 October 2017 - 12:56 PM.


houghtonbee #192 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:36 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 242 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    06-23-2013

View Post_Poe, on 12 October 2017 - 07:31 AM, said:

I got message from WG leaker.

I will post this to this community for reference.


 

World of Warplanes has been   sacrificed.


 

Game was barely profitable.


 However Wargaming decided to use existing resources of the game to make experiment, as they are pushing boundaries .

 

Explanation:


Wargaming is experimenting with integrating battlefield game (air. ground, sea), and first step, and the least risky was to do it starting with planes.


 There you are gentlemen  pilots (and former pilots), our  blowed game  is  victim , an old bulding destroyed  in order to bult newer one 10 x larger, sacrifice for the "greater good".

 

 

 

Screenshot the message, censor the persons account details and post it here, bit more believable than this fantasy........



Toxoplasmosi #193 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:40 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 6 battles
  • 3
  • [ITA_6] ITA_6
  • Member since:
    11-28-2015
I understand that 1.9 should be reviewed, some correction to avoid unreal things. But this 2.0 is completely another game.
So guys, thanks for playing with me, thanks for the time spent together and for the good battles (thanks also to the BOT... ah ah ah). But I leave. Toxoplasmosis [ITA_6]


_Poe #194 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:42 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 583 battles
  • 180
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

View Posthoughtonbee, on 12 October 2017 - 07:36 AM, said:

 

Screenshot the message, censor the persons account details and post it here, bit more believable than this fantasy........

 

You have it.To censor person that gived us a truth( I am sure in it)?


Or you can start game, run your preferable plane (which is now individualy less significant than ever) and participate in your little plane as the first test of the first phase of 3-dimensional battlefield Wargaming is experimenting with, sacrifying old game.


 

Old game doesn't exist anymore ,except by name.(you at least, I hope,  don't ask for confirmation for this to?)


Edited by _Poe, 12 October 2017 - 07:50 AM.


houghtonbee #195 Posted 12 October 2017 - 07:49 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 242 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    06-23-2013

View Post_Poe, on 12 October 2017 - 07:42 AM, said:

 

You have it.To censor person that gived us a truth( I am sure in it)?


 

Or you can start game, run your preferable plane (which is now individualy less significant than ever) and participate in your little plane as the first test of the first phase of 3-dimensional battlefield Wargaming is experimenting with.(sarifying old game, in fact it doesnt exist anymore ,except by name).

 

​Mate, I can't even get this shower of crap to load anymore due to it crashing even if I wanted too :D 

 

Doesn't mean I'm going to resort to posting pathetic lies on here though to get my own way. I could claim WG have messaged me to say anything, put up a screenshot or your post means nothing.


Edited by houghtonbee, 12 October 2017 - 07:49 AM.


Phantom_JaboG35 #196 Posted 12 October 2017 - 08:32 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 15 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    03-17-2016
Honestly, you should be glad that this rubbish crashes. Maybe even your PC feels like being fooled...

BearZstrike #197 Posted 12 October 2017 - 08:37 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 306 battles
  • 3
  • [4CAF] 4CAF
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

Thank you ALL for great time and great epic battles, great game. I enjoy it every second I was online.

Good bye!

Wish for resurrection, I believe in God, so it can be done in WG too (but if Satan allows).

GG ALL!



wlatopa #198 Posted 12 October 2017 - 08:44 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 86 battles
  • 520
  • Member since:
    03-18-2014
Liars.They are trying to find an excuse to hide their failures but they knows very well where is the problem. They are completely unable to do a good marketing strategy and ,without listening users,they are unable to fix all problems that the game was have (MM,op flight,low fps on some maps,graphics bugs ecc.ecc.).
Good the first idea,but totally unable to do a good developing.
Every update was worst than precedent and they have think (:trollface:) that an idiot game with same name should can fix all problems.This new is dedicated to kids,and the kids don't have money to spend for this very expensive game.Very inconsequent thinking.In this mode they loose old players and didn't have new. A total failure,in every field,marketing and developing. All the time and money spended for this game was lost for the unability of chief of marketing and the developers.
If i was the chief,all developers should be fired and send to take potatoes in the fields.

Edited by wlatopa, 12 October 2017 - 09:07 AM.


Pink_unikorn #199 Posted 12 October 2017 - 08:55 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Conquest Member
  • 2 battles
  • 10
  • [MS-GR] MS-GR
  • Member since:
    03-19-2016
Wlapota! Your right Bro....

0berhessen #200 Posted 12 October 2017 - 09:04 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 449 battles
  • 145
  • [JG26] JG26
  • Member since:
    06-27-2016

View Postwlatopa, on 12 October 2017 - 08:44 AM, said:

Liars.They are trying to find an excuse to hide their failures but they knows very well where is the problem. They are completely unable to do a good marketing strategy and ,without listening users,they are unable to fix all problems that the game was have (MM,op flight,low fps on some maps,graphics bugs ecc.ecc.).
Good the first idea,but totally unable to do a good developing.
Every update was worst than precedent and they have think (:trollface:) that an idiot game with same name should can fix all problems.This new is dedicated to kids,and the kids don't have money to spend for this very expensive game.Very unlogic thinking.In this mode they loose old players and didn't have new. A total failure,in every field,marketing and developing. All the time and money spended for this game was lost for the unability of chief of marketing and the developers.
If i was the chief,all developers should be fired and send to take potatoes in the fields.

 

Haha yes, but after some time they would present you potatoes 2.0 (formerly known as carrots)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users