Jump to content


Best games in 2.0


  • Please log in to reply
136 replies to this topic

eekeeboo #1 Posted 18 October 2017 - 11:56 AM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 4154 battles
  • 2,200
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

I figured this is a thread that could do with being revived in the 2.0 game mode. Post screenshots of your best game in 2.0, or a game you're particularly proud of. Maybe a game where you carried so hard you had to have a nap after. 

 

I'm looking forward to seeing how the planes have changed and what people move towards to get those epic games. 

 

I won't post any of my own to start with, I don't want to brag, I'd rather give a place for new players and experienced players alike to brag! 



VeryRisky #2 Posted 18 October 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 379 battles
  • 65
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

I'm not experienced wnought to know if this counts as decent but it did win a lot of bling!

 

 

And I'll edit is my best XP with a Kozhedub


Edited by VeryRisky, 19 October 2017 - 12:03 AM.


omglaserspewpew #3 Posted 18 October 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1717 battles
  • 1,132
  • [3VS27] 3VS27
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

WoWp 2.0 is hardTM

 

 

F-94D. Was a "fun" match where the game flipped 4 points to the enemy right when the squall line hit, without there being enemy planes over two of them, lol. MagikTM. But I decided to have none of it and killed them all.

 

We need replays asap to highlight crap like this.

 

EDIT: one more thing: as you can see, I only attained rank 4 (out of 5), eventhough I single-handedly annihilated 6 of their planes in the last minute and hard carried. But I guess this isn't enough for the top rank, because I didn't do other arbitrarily selected stuff, lol. Load of bull.


Edited by omglaserspewpew, 18 October 2017 - 12:58 PM.


ArtyIsSuperior #4 Posted 18 October 2017 - 02:41 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 15 battles
  • 89
  • Member since:
    04-24-2017
we are all happy for you

_Davidge_ #5 Posted 18 October 2017 - 05:09 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1471 battles
  • 266
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

View Posteekeeboo, on 18 October 2017 - 11:56 AM, said:

I figured this is a thread that could do with being revived in the 2.0 game mode. Post screenshots of your best game in 2.0, or a game you're particularly proud of. Maybe a game where you carried so hard you had to have a nap after.

 

I'm looking forward to seeing how the planes have changed and what people move towards to get those epic games.

 

I won't post any of my own to start with, I don't want to brag, I'd rather give a place for new players and experienced players alike to brag!

 

 

I feel Messerschmitts 109 finally got their 5 minutes, this wide space of 2.0 battles is their element.

 

If anyone with experience thought Germans were not optimal before, play them now.

 

 Me's are in my opinion clearly better (more influential) in 2.0 than in 1.9.


Combination of high horisontal speed and energy conservation in vertical manouvers enables them more influence and better reaction on developments over this now much  larger battlefield.

 

Of course this is if developer will not nerf them, I hope not because now finally  those are true Me 109's .

 

 


Edited by _Poe, 18 October 2017 - 05:23 PM.

“When you're a combat pilot, you believe you're the best in the air. If you do, you're not cocky, you're combat-ready. If you don't, you'd better find another line of work.” 

John Glenn


reverzibilni #6 Posted 18 October 2017 - 06:51 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 31 battles
  • 188
  • [PM101] PM101
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

 

Slowly veteran players are back in game...


               
    

eekeeboo #7 Posted 19 October 2017 - 07:26 AM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 4154 battles
  • 2,200
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostVeryRisky, on 18 October 2017 - 12:42 PM, said:

I'm not experienced wnought to know if this counts as decent but it did win a lot of bling!

 

Nice to see a Dinger on these parts of the forums, but please don't bring too many friends here :P Also the more bling on the right side, the better a game you had! How are you finding the new planes? 

 

View Postomglaserspewpew, on 18 October 2017 - 12:42 PM, said:

. But I guess this isn't enough for the top rank, because I didn't do other arbitrarily selected stuff, lol.

 

Nice game, but you mean defend sectors from the enemy team and thus not have any sectors flipped because you would have prevented anyone from capping? :P 

View Postreverzibilni, on 18 October 2017 - 06:51 PM, said:

 

Slowly veteran players are back in game...

 

I never left! 

omglaserspewpew #8 Posted 19 October 2017 - 10:01 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1717 battles
  • 1,132
  • [3VS27] 3VS27
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Posteekeeboo, on 19 October 2017 - 07:26 AM, said:

Nice game, but you mean defend sectors from the enemy team and thus not have any sectors flipped because you would have prevented anyone from capping? :P 

 

Heh, you know what I mean. :trollface: Let's take HFs - they don't have defending caps among their three ranking categories. So if you defend caps against their GAA and bomber attacks (which HFs are very best at), you only get points in a single category - plane kills.

VeryRisky #9 Posted 19 October 2017 - 09:32 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 379 battles
  • 65
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

View Posteekeeboo, on 19 October 2017 - 07:26 AM, said:

Nice to see a Dinger on these parts of the forums, but please don't bring too many friends here :P Also the more bling on the right side, the better a game you had! How are you finding the new planes? 

 

 

 

There are a few flying Dingers.    I might be able to get on with the new game here, it's hooked me for a while.



Crossmory #10 Posted 19 October 2017 - 10:56 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 1952 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013
:izmena:

Crossmory #11 Posted 19 October 2017 - 10:58 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 1952 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013
shot_005.jpg

eekeeboo #12 Posted 20 October 2017 - 07:48 AM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 4154 battles
  • 2,200
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postomglaserspewpew, on 19 October 2017 - 10:01 AM, said:

 

Heh, you know what I mean. :trollface: Let's take HFs - they don't have defending caps among their three ranking categories. So if you defend caps against their GAA and bomber attacks (which HFs are very best at), you only get points in a single category - plane kills.

 

But you took a multi role and they do have a defending task as do light fighters. Heavy fighters should batter the enemy caps and bombers, thus giving your light fighters and multi roles and easier time if your team is struggling. 

 

I'm hoping for replays soon. I got a bombardier in my blenheim bomber at 2.5k.... was a surprise. 



omglaserspewpew #13 Posted 20 October 2017 - 12:57 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1717 battles
  • 1,132
  • [3VS27] 3VS27
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Yesterday I was in a 110B on one of those desert maps that have a crucial cap point in the middle. Literally whole game I was repelling enemy attacks in a way that I dived and crippled 3-4 enemy planes in a swoop, which were then finished by teammates. This way we completely locked middle from the enemy, who just kept coming, so I had absolutely no time to go look at some neighbouring cap. I got by far the most damage in team and some ludicrous number of assists ... but I still didn't get even a single rank, because these require plane KILLS and capping on attack. :teethhappy: See where I'm getting?

 

Bottom line is: this reward system si complete crap. It has some nebulous requirements that many times go against what you should be doing to actually win.

 

Here, I have a similar game in 210 which I actually screenshotted:

 

 

Zillion supporting achievements, most points in the team, no ranks. Is stronk logik.

 

 


 

eekeeboo #14 Posted 20 October 2017 - 01:52 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 4154 battles
  • 2,200
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postomglaserspewpew, on 20 October 2017 - 12:57 PM, said:

Yesterday I was in a 110B on one of those desert maps that have a crucial cap point in the middle. Literally whole game I was repelling enemy attacks in a way that I dived and crippled 3-4 enemy planes in a swoop, which were then finished by teammates. This way we completely locked middle from the enemy, who just kept coming, so I had absolutely no time to go look at some neighbouring cap. I got by far the most damage in team and some ludicrous number of assists ... but I still didn't get even a single rank, because these require plane KILLS and capping on attack. :teethhappy: See where I'm getting?

 

Bottom line is: this reward system si complete crap. It has some nebulous requirements that many times go against what you should be doing to actually win.

 

And yet, still not a good game or screenshot of a good game! 

 

Heavies shouldn't have the task of defending so much with the requirement they intercept bombers and push back airfields etc. 



omglaserspewpew #15 Posted 20 October 2017 - 01:56 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1717 battles
  • 1,132
  • [3VS27] 3VS27
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Sorry for the offtopic. :P But why have these stupid requirements in the first place?? Before 2.0, we had experience and kills and that was more or less enough.

 

And consequently, what is a great game? The game where you get rank 1 and lose, because you farmed rank point by defending a single cap with a LF, or is it a game where you hard carried and got no ranks at all because stupid game didn't know how to award you for your contribution?!



eekeeboo #16 Posted 21 October 2017 - 06:29 AM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 4154 battles
  • 2,200
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

 

And consequently, what is a great game? 

Well I didn't want to self boast, but here's one of many "great games"

 

And alternatively to test fail flight ability and if you can still do well with a low tier plane, I lost, but as you can see, I did just fine with a 3 tier difference. 

 

 


Edited by eekeeboo, 21 October 2017 - 06:32 AM.


Varjopiipari #17 Posted 27 October 2017 - 10:36 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 1247 battles
  • 2
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    10-18-2013

This!

https://imgur.com/JyW6PRU


Edited by Varjopiipari, 28 October 2017 - 05:18 PM.


eekeeboo #18 Posted 27 October 2017 - 11:04 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 4154 battles
  • 2,200
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostVarjopiipari, on 27 October 2017 - 10:36 PM, said:

This!

 

Not loading for me :( Your best bet is to upload it to something like imgur or an image hosting site and then link it with the post submission tool. 

VeryRisky #19 Posted 28 October 2017 - 12:28 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 379 battles
  • 65
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012
I'm finding the Tier 1 P-12 good for a big game to win a couple of tokens a day bashing bots.

jss78 #20 Posted 28 October 2017 - 04:07 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1699 battles
  • 78
  • Member since:
    05-08-2016

Just started playing this game this week.

 

First game in that gift-code AR-67 was a bit ridiculous. One of those late-night games with lots of bots, a total turkey shoot.

 

 

 

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users