Jump to content


how many players played last day ?

battle fought players onlie statistics 2.0

  • Please log in to reply
170 replies to this topic

Dr_Ar_MG #41 Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:59 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 1276 battles
  • 325
  • Member since:
    04-28-2016

yeah. and many of the players who still playing game still like 1.9 more than 2,0 or many want both versions ...

 

two days ago 6 . 2  .2018

 

just 3053 had minimum 5 battles. it was 3447 last calculation ...

and I have to refrsh several times to see hall of fame. always Error Building Request. they hided everything and I don't know why they don't put a survey in game ?!

 

 



majid_HD #42 Posted 20 February 2018 - 08:52 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

today 19. 2 . 2018 (plot 2 _new)

last player had at least 5 battles has the place 3196 . you can (see it here )

 

there is the plot of battle fought.

the Vertical Axis is number of player

the Horizontal Axis is number of battle fought of each player

for example :486 players had 5 battles

                     405 player had 6 battles

                     109 players had 15 battles

the total battle fought in hall of fame for 1 day : 36798(+5 battles) in hall of fame !

let's suppose +4000 extra battles for 4 battles and less (400 player for 1,2,3,4 battles =4000 battles)

so 36798 + 4000 = 407980 !      40798 maximum battle fought in 1 day

and 3196 (players in hall) +1600 (players we supposed with 4 battles and less) = 4796 total players last day

( I think +1600 players for player with less 5 battles is fair enough )

for 10 min each battle >>>>>>> 407980 minutes = 6799.66 hours >>>>>> 6799.66 hours /4796 players = 1.42 hours average for each player

for 15 min each battle >>>>>>> 611970 minutes =10199.5 hours >>>>>>10199.5 hours /4796 players= 2.1 hours average for each player (MAXIMUM !)

24 hours / 1.42 =16.9  so =>  4796/16.9 = 284  (min) average online players per hour !

24 hours / 2.1= 11.43     so =>  4796/11.43   = 419  (max) average online players per hour !

 

last time min was 304 ( -20) and max was 453 ( -34)

_______________________________________________________

Documents:

http://image.ibb.co/gfah5x/last_5_kaszas_190.jpg

http://image.ibb.co/fdV75x/last_6.jpg

http://image.ibb.co/eG7WXc/Last_7.jpg

http://image.ibb.co/dWNLQx/Last_8.jpg

http://image.ibb.co/h0UdCc/last_9.jpg

http://image.ibb.co/fynWXc/Last_10.jpg

http://image.ibb.co/hAjBXc/Last_11.jpg

http://image.ibb.co/c3iukx/Last_12.jpg

http://image.ibb.co/gZKBXc/Last_13.jpg

you can see rest in the hall of fame

 

 


Edited by majid_HD, 20 February 2018 - 08:59 PM.


Funny_Farmer #43 Posted 20 February 2018 - 09:07 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 589 battles
  • 62
  • Member since:
    12-31-2012

Hi all, perhaps you are under-estimating the number of players with less than 5 battles per day. I am a rather casual player and I don't think I EVER played 5 battles in one evening, Usually I play 2-3 battles. I imagine you'd have to be kind of hard core to play a single game more than an hour every evening (or a student, of course there were no online games when I went to college :teethhappy:).



majid_HD #44 Posted 20 February 2018 - 09:29 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

View PostFunny_Farmer, on 20 February 2018 - 09:07 PM, said:

Hi all, perhaps you are under-estimating the number of players with less than 5 battles per day. I am a rather casual player and I don't think I EVER played 5 battles in one evening, Usually I play 2-3 battles. I imagine you'd have to be kind of hard core to play a single game more than an hour every evening (or a student, of course there were no online games when I went to college :teethhappy:).

dude 5 battles takes max 1 hour

 

anyway I used the same method of calculation which used in the start of  this topic and it proves a Reduction !

 

I supposed +1600 players with less 5 battles

you are just one and it's a fair number . 486 players had 5 battles

 

ok game had 3200 players with +5 battles and I suppose 1600 for less 5 battles ! but just for you . . .

suppose 1000 players with 4 battles

               1000 players with 3 battles

               1000 players with 2 battles

               1000 players with 1 battles

totally     +4000! with 4 battles and less!

even if we suppose +4000 players with 4 battles and less >>>+ 10,000 battles >>>>we will have 40798+10000=50798 it means %24 more

so just for you 352 min player and 520 max !! enough ??!!! the game had 3196 players with 5 battles to +30 battles and I supposed +4000 players with -5 battles !!!

 

2.0 has 520 average online players in the best dreams ! now go compare it with 1.9

 

 


Edited by majid_HD, 20 February 2018 - 09:35 PM.


majid_HD #45 Posted 20 February 2018 - 09:31 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

the lovely 1.9 average of all years !

1.9 had 633 AVERAGE online players !


Edited by majid_HD, 20 February 2018 - 09:39 PM.


majid_HD #46 Posted 21 February 2018 - 05:07 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

last 4 weeks

you need only 100 battles to be in the list of 4 weeks >> 100/30 days=3.3 ! just 3.3 battle per day!

!Spoiler

 

It means 820 x(100/(100-83.27))= 4901 players last 4 weeks (I know the real number of players is more, it's just a comparison !)

only 4901 had 3-4 battles per day !

players in the hall of fame last day with 5 battles and more

Spoiler

 


Edited by majid_HD, 21 February 2018 - 05:14 PM.


BravelyRanAway #47 Posted 21 February 2018 - 10:42 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 1978 battles
  • 787
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

OK.....numbers are low....very low.

In this screenshot after the game, I just checked the players for games played and found...............................just me being the only human player on my team....and just one human player(Ki-88) on the enemy team.

Spoiler

Now, some of you will say bring back 1.9 as it had more players........but, that won't happen. 2.0 is the last chance for WG in the flying dept'....if this keeps up, WoWP's is going to die with no more rebirths.


Edited by BravelyRanAway, 22 February 2018 - 07:11 PM.

"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing".G.B.Shaw


Grumpy_Guts #48 Posted 21 February 2018 - 11:44 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 4378 battles
  • 899
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012
Think the Spitfire V was the human with name and numbers for tag.

jss78 #49 Posted 21 February 2018 - 11:51 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1531 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    05-08-2016

View PostFunny_Farmer, on 20 February 2018 - 09:07 PM, said:

Hi all, perhaps you are under-estimating the number of players with less than 5 battles per day. I am a rather casual player and I don't think I EVER played 5 battles in one evening, Usually I play 2-3 battles. I imagine you'd have to be kind of hard core to play a single game more than an hour every evening (or a student, of course there were no online games when I went to college :teethhappy:).

 

Same for me, 2-3 games is about normal I'll play in an evening. I expect there are lots of people like this.

majid_HD #50 Posted 22 February 2018 - 01:58 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

View Postjss78, on 21 February 2018 - 11:51 PM, said:

 

Same for me, 2-3 games is about normal I'll play in an evening. I expect there are lots of people like this.

 

I answered this I added +4000 players for 4 battles and less isn't enough ?. 3200 guys had +5 battles and I told 4000 guys with 4 battles and less. but it's still less than 1.9.

and look at the results for 4 weeks you need 100 battles 100/28days =3.5 battles per day ! and just 4901 .

please !!!



jnishar #51 Posted 22 February 2018 - 10:29 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1964 battles
  • 232
  • [D_O_D] D_O_D
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 21 February 2018 - 10:42 PM, said:

OK.....numbers are low....very low.

In this screenshot after the game, I just checked the players for games played and found...............................just me being the only human player on my team....and just one human player(Ki-88) on the enemy team.

Now, some of you will say bring back 1.9 as it had more players........but, that won't happen. 2.0 is the last chance for WG in the flying dept'....if this keeps up, WoWP's is going to die with no more rebirths.

 

yesterday, at around the time im writing this, there were atleast 6 humans on each side in atleast 2 matches.
Take it to the limit.
One more time.

majid_HD #52 Posted 22 February 2018 - 04:00 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

View Postjnishar, on 22 February 2018 - 10:29 AM, said:

 

yesterday, at around the time im writing this, there were atleast 6 humans on each side in atleast 2 matches.

 

really ?!

so forget the statistics and calculation and this picture ! 2.0 has 10 times more player even more than all the games in history

Spoiler

and why do you think 1.9 nerver had ...?

look at this ! 7 humans each side ! so if examples were proves 1.9 had more players !

Spoiler

the face is the plots above


Edited by majid_HD, 23 February 2018 - 01:33 PM.


houghtonbee #53 Posted 22 February 2018 - 04:26 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1022 battles
  • 148
  • Member since:
    06-23-2013

where WG really ballsed up was in implementing just one game mode, which is leading to the same fail in numbers playing the game as 1.9 had. What they should have done is add the conquest mode in addition to the dogfight mode that was 1.9, keeping the old guard onside (who would have ended up playing the new mode alongside dogfight I reckon) and tempted in the new/lapsed players. Instead they pushed away (it seems) a significant number of old players to gain some new players who seem to be starting to lose interest already.

 

Bring back a dogfight option, allow a better view of the lovely warbirds in game (the standard view is way too far back imo) and improving the HUD should be WG's priority to save this game in this WOWP player of 5 years opinion.


Edited by houghtonbee, 22 February 2018 - 04:27 PM.


majid_HD #54 Posted 22 February 2018 - 05:43 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

View Posthoughtonbee, on 22 February 2018 - 04:26 PM, said:

where WG really ballsed up was in implementing just one game mode, which is leading to the same fail in numbers playing the game as 1.9 had. What they should have done is add the conquest mode in addition to the dogfight mode that was 1.9, keeping the old guard onside (who would have ended up playing the new mode alongside dogfight I reckon) and tempted in the new/lapsed players. Instead they pushed away (it seems) a significant number of old players to gain some new players who seem to be starting to lose interest already.

 

Bring back a dogfight option, allow a better view of the lovely warbirds in game (the standard view is way too far back imo) and improving the HUD should be WG's priority to save this game in this WOWP player of 5 years opinion.

 

I'm not agree, maybe you're right but It's risky. it's possible to break players group in several groups and they have to wait in the queue.

1.9 was fine, yes it had many problems, but the mistake of WG was that they never listened to us, they didn't care ...

they could've much more players in 1.9 .

2.0 is new buggy game +most of the problems in1.9  + new problem. it's obvious to have less players.

I told it a few months before, many people said NO! look we spend less time in the queue so game has more player ! there's many way to reduced time in the queue but it doesn't mean game has more players.

anyway now every thing even queue time shows that 2.0 is not better.



jnishar #55 Posted 22 February 2018 - 05:50 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1964 battles
  • 232
  • [D_O_D] D_O_D
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View Postmajid_HD, on 22 February 2018 - 04:00 PM, said:

 

really ?!

so forget the statistics and calculation and this picture ! 2.0 has 10 times more player even more than all the games in history

Spoiler

and why do you think 1.9 nerver had ...?

look at this ! 7 humans each side ! so if examples were proves 1.9 had more players !

the face is the plots above

I tell you what i saw. And around that time, two days in a row, there has been these 5 vs 5 matches. even a 6 vs 6 match yesterday

i had an idea that someone wouldnt belive me so i took a picture of one of them .

https://ibb.co/cfbihc


Take it to the limit.
One more time.

majid_HD #56 Posted 22 February 2018 - 07:07 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

View Postjnishar, on 22 February 2018 - 05:50 PM, said:

I tell you what i saw. And around that time, two days in a row, there has been these 5 vs 5 matches. even a 6 vs 6 match yesterday

i had an idea that someone wouldnt belive me so i took a picture of one of them .

https://ibb.co/cfbihc

 

man I believe you, I myself see it many times ,I didn't say you lie, I mean we can't judge with examples, samples...

 


Edited by majid_HD, 22 February 2018 - 07:09 PM.


jnishar #57 Posted 22 February 2018 - 08:03 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1964 battles
  • 232
  • [D_O_D] D_O_D
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View Postmajid_HD, on 22 February 2018 - 07:07 PM, said:

 

man I believe you, I myself see it many times ,I didn't say you lie, I mean we can't judge with examples, samples...

 

 

I hope, somehow, there are more players playing this than meets the eye.. I would hate losing this game, WT isnt as good as this game.
Take it to the limit.
One more time.

jnishar #58 Posted 23 February 2018 - 07:14 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1964 battles
  • 232
  • [D_O_D] D_O_D
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
First match today, 8 vs 8....  :)
Take it to the limit.
One more time.

majid_HD #59 Posted 23 February 2018 - 10:19 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 62 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

View Postjnishar, on 23 February 2018 - 07:14 PM, said:

First match today, 8 vs 8....  :)

 

ok enough ,2.0 has 10 million players minimum ! maybe much more than 10 millions. . .

jnishar #60 Posted 23 February 2018 - 10:48 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1964 battles
  • 232
  • [D_O_D] D_O_D
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View Postmajid_HD, on 23 February 2018 - 10:19 PM, said:

 

ok enough ,2.0 has 10 million players minimum ! maybe much more than 10 millions. . .

 

Sarcasm is always funny :)  perhabs its time you find something new to play? And go to their forums and talk instead of hanging around here?? you really have to move on at one point, or perhabs try the game again? ohh and btw, i was in a 9 vs 9 match also.. 
Take it to the limit.
One more time.





Also tagged with battle, fought, players, onlie, statistics, 2.0

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users