Jump to content


Well...


  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

chief_de_wrecker #41 Posted 23 June 2018 - 01:47 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 2135 battles
  • 62
  • [A_D_C] A_D_C
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 22 June 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

 

Because not all the players visit the forum.

 

so, those who don't visit forums, how exactly did they make their representation?

eekeeboo #42 Posted 23 June 2018 - 09:34 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 4485 battles
  • 2,413
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postchief_de_wrecker, on 23 June 2018 - 01:47 PM, said:

 

so, those who don't visit forums, how exactly did they make their representation?

 

I believe that was the point he's making ;) 

BravelyRanAway #43 Posted 23 June 2018 - 10:01 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 2563 battles
  • 955
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostCyclonite_, on 23 June 2018 - 11:36 AM, said:

 

^ brain missing

 

All my replies have been following the nature of your initial response. Are you really such a dimwit? 

Really?....you think my first response below is toxic?

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 22 June 2018 - 10:52 AM, said:

No...it doesn't...not even in WoT.

I really think you need to recalibrate your anger meter. The only one toxic here is you, with your cabbage head and dimwit comments. There's only you name calling as your initial point is wrong but you don't want to accept that you could be wrong.  

I believe you think anyone who just disagrees with you is toxic, which is a very low bar to set.


"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing".G.B.Shaw


eekeeboo #44 Posted 24 June 2018 - 01:31 AM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 4485 battles
  • 2,413
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
Stay on topic please. Avoid personal insults and provocation. This is for all people. No one likes warning points and forum punishments :( 

Nytril #45 Posted 24 June 2018 - 02:49 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 4675 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    12-22-2014

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 23 June 2018 - 10:01 PM, said:

Really?....you think my first response below is toxic?

I really think you need to recalibrate your anger meter. The only one toxic here is you, with your cabbage head and dimwit comments. There's only you name calling as your initial point is wrong but you don't want to accept that you could be wrong.  

I believe you think anyone who just disagrees with you is toxic, which is a very low bar to set.

 

There you go again, mouth bigger than the mersey tunnel. Do you really have nothing positive to say ever?

Nytril #46 Posted 24 June 2018 - 02:57 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 4675 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    12-22-2014

View Posteekeeboo, on 24 June 2018 - 01:31 AM, said:

Stay on topic please. Avoid personal insults and provocation. This is for all people. No one likes warning points and forum punishments :( 

 

Please do, I've uninstalled warplanes and need a good excuse not to revisite the trash talk by a few individuals who like the sound of their own voice but have nothing constructive to say. I'm off now, goodbye. Oh and btw..... I have 11 wargaming accounts from playing so much tanks :D You may have to guess who, lol.

BravelyRanAway #47 Posted 24 June 2018 - 03:07 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 2563 battles
  • 955
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostCyclonite_, on 24 June 2018 - 02:49 PM, said:

 

There you go again, mouth bigger than the mersey tunnel. Do you really have nothing positive to say ever?

I'm actually embarrassed for you. Anyone reading this thread can see you've thrown your toys out of the pram over nothing.:teethhappy:

 

I wonder how hard it'll be for WG to match an  IP to accounts.


Edited by BravelyRanAway, 24 June 2018 - 03:14 PM.

"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing".G.B.Shaw


dreambill #48 Posted 24 June 2018 - 07:02 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 1995 battles
  • 605
  • [GR-12] GR-12
  • Member since:
    07-25-2013

I really don't get it. People visiting forums overwhelmingly voted against V2.0, This is a fact.

Now people that didn't vote we assume that "ALL" are in favor of V2.0 ? How come this ?

And I said before that if there was a lot more players than before in the game I would had shut my mouth and accept that I (we) are a minority.

BUT the players are at best in the same level as in V1.9 if not less. (I play from time to time and see how many are in battles).

AND before rush to be against my thoughts (being afraid that you might sometime loose your favorite game, as it happened to me),

I inform you one more time that my plea has long ago changed from "REVERT" to "ADD BACK" V1.9

Since there are a few people enjoying v2.0 I see no reason to loose what they like to play. As I see no reason why we lost what we like to play.



zen_monk_ #49 Posted 24 June 2018 - 07:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 4255 battles
  • 1,013
  • [__] __
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdreambill, on 24 June 2018 - 07:02 PM, said:

 

I inform you one more time that my plea has long ago changed from "REVERT" to "ADD BACK" V1.9

 

 This is the most intelligent change ever in this whole "we want 1.9" thingy. For what it's worth, I support this fully.

 

Haven't tried 1.9, left the game at ~1.3-1.4 or something. I've read coherent high reviews from some of you and would like to try it. On the other hand, for me 2.x rocks and wouldn't like to lose it for the world.

 

But I don't get why they don't implement "choose classic or modern" (to avoid all the 1.x - 2.x branding). They already have the code written. Everyone would be happy.


stats were invented by Satan himself to suck the carefree fun out of gaming

BravelyRanAway #50 Posted 24 June 2018 - 07:46 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 2563 battles
  • 955
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdreambill, on 24 June 2018 - 07:02 PM, said:

Now people that didn't vote we assume that "ALL" are in favor of V2.0 ? How come this ?

Who assumed that?:amazed:


"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing".G.B.Shaw


Nytril #51 Posted 24 June 2018 - 07:53 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 4675 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    12-22-2014

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 24 June 2018 - 03:07 PM, said:

I'm actually embarrassed for you. Anyone reading this thread can see you've thrown your toys out of the pram over nothing.:teethhappy:

 

I wonder how hard it'll be for WG to match an  IP to accounts.

Nah I'm cool, you are the mr angry, congrats.

 

Ip address to accounts? Haha you are so naive. 



Nytril #52 Posted 24 June 2018 - 07:55 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 4675 battles
  • 61
  • Member since:
    12-22-2014

View Posthoughtonbee, on 24 June 2018 - 07:10 PM, said:

 

 

Yeh, I'm severely disabled and confined to my house, so world of tanks was my only escape.

Edited by eekeeboo, 25 June 2018 - 08:22 AM.


dreambill #53 Posted 24 June 2018 - 08:02 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 1995 battles
  • 605
  • [GR-12] GR-12
  • Member since:
    07-25-2013

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 24 June 2018 - 07:46 PM, said:

Who assumed that?:amazed:

 

Sorry I probably misinterpreted your words.

So we stand to, we don't know, what all players that didn't vote, think about V1.9 and conquest ?



BravelyRanAway #54 Posted 24 June 2018 - 08:17 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 2563 battles
  • 955
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostCyclonite_, on 24 June 2018 - 07:53 PM, said:

Nah I'm cool, you are the mr angry, congrats.

 

Ip address to accounts? Haha you are so naive. 

Say's the only guy in the thread who name calls.:sceptic:


"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing".G.B.Shaw


BravelyRanAway #55 Posted 24 June 2018 - 08:19 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 2563 battles
  • 955
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdreambill, on 24 June 2018 - 08:02 PM, said:

 

Sorry I probably misinterpreted your words.

So we stand to, we don't know, what all players that didn't vote, think about V1.9 and conquest ?

yes, I meant that we don't know, so we cannot assume either way. But those who played 1.9 and stuck with it are more likely to be on the forum and therefore more likely to vote to reverse and skew the result.


"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing".G.B.Shaw


dreambill #56 Posted 24 June 2018 - 08:48 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 1995 battles
  • 605
  • [GR-12] GR-12
  • Member since:
    07-25-2013

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 24 June 2018 - 08:19 PM, said:

yes, I meant that we don't know, so we cannot assume either way. But those who played 1.9 and stuck with it are more likely to be on the forum and therefore more likely to vote to reverse and skew the result.

 

Ok then, I can agree to this, Can you agree that by results so far (player numbers), conquest doesn't perform any better than V1.9 ?

And if so, why not to have the old mode permanently alongside conquest ? Its a completely different gameplay with emphasis in pure flying - dogfighting and not strategic region conquering as now.

As it looks so far about the same number of people as now were happy with it.

In fact I can see that V2.0 is far better as an entry level for new players, and I really want new players to come into the game.

But V1.9 is far better and satisfactory for advanced players IMHO

 


Edited by dreambill, 24 June 2018 - 09:00 PM.


BravelyRanAway #57 Posted 24 June 2018 - 08:56 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 2563 battles
  • 955
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdreambill, on 24 June 2018 - 08:48 PM, said:

 

Ok then, I can agree to this, Can you agree that by results so far (player numbers), conquest doesn't perform any better than V1.9 ?

And if so, why not to have the old mode permanently alongside conquest ? Its a completely different gameplay with emphasis in pure flying - dogfighting and not strategic region conquering as now.

As it looks so far about the same number of people as now were happy with it.

Yes...I can agree that the numbers are no better. But the reasons for that are not because 2.0 is as bad or worse....it's just that WoWP's has a bad name. As I said before, many have tried WoWP's and didn't like it and most will not come back as they don't see 1.9 or 2.0, all they see is WoWP's and they didn't like it the first time. 

The amount of bugs that 2.0 and 2.5 has been released with does nothing to improve WoWP's image even for the few who do come back.


"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing".G.B.Shaw


BravelyRanAway #58 Posted 24 June 2018 - 09:22 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 2563 battles
  • 955
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostCyclonite_, on 24 June 2018 - 07:55 PM, said:

 

Yeh, I'm severely disabled and confined to my house, so world of tanks was my only escape.

 

Sorry to hear that J.

"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing".G.B.Shaw


Grumpy_Guts #59 Posted 24 June 2018 - 09:29 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 5333 battles
  • 921
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012

View Postdreambill, on 24 June 2018 - 08:48 PM, said:

 

Ok then, I can agree to this, Can you agree that by results so far (player numbers), conquest doesn't perform any better than V1.9 ?

And if so, why not to have the old mode permanently alongside conquest ? Its a completely different gameplay with emphasis in pure flying - dogfighting and not strategic region conquering as now.

As it looks so far about the same number of people as now were happy with it.

In fact I can see that V2.0 is far better as an entry level for new players, and I really want new players to come into the game.

But V1.9 is far better and satisfactory for advanced players IMHO

 

 

Can agree with you that 2.0 has much to offer to new players and can accept game play has merit for old and new alike.

Could not fly fighters very well in 1.9 but still had a go, found GAA was my niche and although very fighter orientated still managed to hold my own and have some very very close and fantastic battles.

Do like 2.0 if only for the fact it allows me to fly anything ( due to control crap ) introduced nullifying aircraft individuality accepted.

Would very much like to see and be able to play both versions as and when, allowing me and many more to continue supporting this game to the level it could out rival the other one, "  WT " or something.  



houghtonbee #60 Posted 25 June 2018 - 07:20 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1650 battles
  • 247
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    06-23-2013

View PostCyclonite_, on 24 June 2018 - 07:55 PM, said:

 

Yeh, I'm severely disabled and confined to my house, so world of tanks was my only escape.

 

I apologise, comment deleted (forum wouldn't let me post on this thread last night?!!).






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users