Jump to content


New game engine survey


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

Poll: WoWp needs a new game engine urgently? (20 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 10 battles in order to participate this poll.

Would you like WoWp to be migrated to a new game engine such as eNcore as a first priority in this game or do you think there are other more pressing matters to be addressed?

  1. New game engine now please (10 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  2. Fix the other stuff first (10 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

Vote Hide poll

Clean #1 Posted 04 August 2018 - 10:11 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 4641 battles
  • 153
  • [FIFO] FIFO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
WG say they need feedback and not complaints. This poll might give some crystal indication as in what we the customers think is most important. Personally I am certain through experience with this game and World of Tanks that BigWorld is at the center of this game's major issues with bugs and poor performance.

Horcan #2 Posted 04 August 2018 - 04:32 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 2073 battles
  • 409
  • [_VI_] _VI_
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
First priority for all i care would be to make the game fun ,  fair( not rigged ), as balanced as possible, and without bots. Graphical details is the least i care. But anyway i doubt they can do whatever i wrote here so not like my feedback matter. Cant vote any of your options since first i already said about, and second i dont know what you mean. Other stuff first means lot of different things for everybody.

johncarps #3 Posted 05 August 2018 - 09:50 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Conquest Member
  • 665 battles
  • 1,852
  • Member since:
    11-21-2013

i vote, i think you are probably right but

 

do you think someone in WG, someone who have the right to make real decision, take care about the survey of the forums ?


définition d'équilibrage : soit d'accord ou dégage de là

balancing definition: either agree or clear from there


GonerNL #4 Posted 06 August 2018 - 07:13 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 3459 battles
  • 313
  • Member since:
    09-02-2017

View PostHorcan, on 04 August 2018 - 04:32 PM, said:

First priority for all i care would be to make the game fun ,  fair( not rigged ), as balanced as possible, a

 

Agreed.

Something needs to be done about match-making and creating balanced teams. Yesterday was an especially bad day ; I think I only won 1 out of 6 battles ... ending up in top 3, you will still make credits and exp, but no materials from scavenging and no progress in first specialist mission (won battles only).



zen_monk_ #5 Posted 06 August 2018 - 07:57 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 2985 battles
  • 614
  • [__] __
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Again, the need for "first 3, last 3". Or "first 1, last 1", it would suits us fine too. Applicable for both materials and progress in won only battles.

 

It would remove so much frustration from the game.



jss78 #6 Posted 06 August 2018 - 01:12 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 1531 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    05-08-2016

Too little info to really say.

 

How much work is the new engine? How much could be achieved on other stuff with 10%, 25%, etc. of that workload? Maybe most importantly, what's the room for improvement with the CURRENT engine, and what's the involved workload?

 

I'm OK with the current audio-visuals, mainly interested in more stable FPS/fewer crashes.

 

 

 

 



Nishi_Kinuyo #7 Posted 06 August 2018 - 05:13 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 516 battles
  • 104
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Who's to say they're not already working on migrating the game to the nCore engine?

Remember, that process took like 2-3 years for WoT due to having to recreate all map-related assets basically from scratch, along with all the maps having to be redone from scratch as well.

 

So imo; have them do both rather than just one; fix current issues first and migrate to better engine later.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users