6 replies to this topic

[crispris]

I want to open this topic with the desire to find out how many of those who play wowp would like the game to return to a number of decent players and want this game to have a future. From my point of view, the game is good in terms of the idea, but it needs some news to attract the players. What do you think, will it have a future or not?

[m249jim]

Feeding stopped

Edited by m249jim, 11 February 2019 - 08:07 PM.

[zen_monk_]

Don't feed him.

[megace4]

 IMHO the 2.0 version got very much improved. It got back the same flight performances as in the old version. Guns got  longer firing ranges for some aircrafts as well as possibility to calibrating them ,engines and aiming. The WG has done quite a good job.

Like some others I have been patient enough for one year.

If I keep on playing this game for the next 25 years at all, i will become 100 years old.lol

cheers,

 

 

Edited by megace4, 11 February 2019 - 08:33 PM.

[Ensign_Steel]

Here's three I'll throw in from the top of my head.

 

- A bit more physics into the flight model and a lot less of the current physics smyshics.

 

- Remove that stupid auto-banner for "ooooh forbidden words!!11".

 

- Redesign the equipment system. The current lottery for the calibration part is just bogus.

[Piq_Mastika]

Ensign_Steel, on 11 February 2019 - 11:32 PM, said:

Here's three I'll throw in from the top of my head.

 

- A bit more physics into the flight model and a lot less of the current physics smyshics.

 

- Remove that stupid auto-banner for "ooooh forbidden words!!11".

 

I strongly agree with this. Especially for the second part. Ignoring people should be easier and the verbal abuse reports should sent a message like "you can ignore the annoying people, they not always deserve a ban"

 

Ensign_Steel, on 11 February 2019 - 11:32 PM, said:

- Redesign the equipment system. The current lottery for the calibration part is just bogus.

 

This is the interesting part. If you want the perfect plane, you should put your sacrifices. It wouldn't be interesting if you know how much money and resources you need for the perfect plane... It will be boring.

[atlasapl]

As far as calibration goes. I used my Ki-88 as a guinea pig to see how far I could push it. I would enhance, then calibrate fully. Then repeat until ultimate. I shaved  a whole second from the turn time, added a significant percentage to the roll rate, and increased its cruise speed (together with appropriate pilot skills).

It was an interesting experiment, but I dont bother with calibration anymore. I doubt the credit and material cost was worth it. But thats ok, as it was just an experiment.

I stick to enhancing now as its good enough. So I am not sure I would change calibration at all. Either enhance (with knows results), or roll the dice and calibrate. Players have a choice.

Edited by atlasapl, 12 February 2019 - 04:12 PM.