Jump to content


Update 2.0.11.6


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

svadilfari #21 Posted 11 April 2019 - 11:56 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 4546 battles
  • 388
  • [FEED] FEED
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
"The Tupolev Tu-1 — Tier VII U.S.S.R. heavy fighter."

typo

edit: it´s actually a VII.

so the article is wrong (says it´s VIII)


Edited by svadilfari, 11 April 2019 - 01:10 PM.


svadilfari #22 Posted 11 April 2019 - 01:40 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 4546 battles
  • 388
  • [FEED] FEED
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Post2ugly, on 11 April 2019 - 09:00 AM, said:

1. Optimisation - no matter how good is your PC, this game on some points of the maps is running really bad...

 

2. Bug fixes - nothing to say, all is well known...

 

3. Daily missions - remove missions from lower tiers ( I-IV ) - expirienced players ruining the game for new players   

                           - remove win condition - make conditions and grind hard as you whant...it is not frustrating like losing 10x in a row when you are on some of that win missions...

 

4. Stop stat padders - remove win/lose ratio from statistic for tiers I - III...give them money and exp just dont count it as a win in statistic...stat padders need to move to tier IV or V. That tiers are much more populated, and they will have harder time over there...new players will have much better expirience with the game...

                                 - it is much better for the new player to play against bots, winnig and having fun, than getting killed over and over again by some "specialist" in his I-15...mabey more of them woud stay with this game...

 

5. Materials - "by popular demand"...give materials to best 3 players on losing team...

 

And priorit for the dev team of this game is to give us some new bombers....GREAT!!!!!!!

   

 

 

 

^what players want



blindfoId #23 Posted 11 April 2019 - 02:18 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Developer
  • 21 battles
  • 272
  • Member since:
    07-19-2018

View Postsvadilfari, on 11 April 2019 - 02:56 PM, said:

"The Tupolev Tu-1 — Tier VII U.S.S.R. heavy fighter."

typo

edit: it´s actually a VII.

so the article is wrong (says it´s VIII)

 

I'm sorry I cannot find any mention of Tier VIII. It's VII for me:

Posted Image



deaxter_hero #24 Posted 12 April 2019 - 11:17 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 4218 battles
  • 158
  • [-DFA-] -DFA-
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013

Let us discuss tactics theory.

 

NEW Navigational Radio Equipment — enhances aircraft concealment and increases its view range from +5% up to +14.6% The downside is that you lose up to 14% of fire accuracy as compared to Ultimate Gyroscopic Sight. Sounds great for bombers and GAs but with neutral defensive aircraft in the game its use seem limited. If a bomber or GA want to cap new base unseen, it will always be spotted by defence aircraft. So with any other plane class. Concealment was big thing pre 2.0 but now? We have to see if it pays out in real battles.


 No majority of OP Heavies flights in 1.9: ---- Alone: 86%    Squad: 14%  ---- Fighter (37%) Heavy Fighter (31%) Multi-role Fighter (20%) Attack Aircraft (13%)


klbergmen #25 Posted 12 April 2019 - 01:28 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 4877 battles
  • 861
  • [JV44] JV44
  • Member since:
    08-13-2014

View Postdeaxter_hero, on 12 April 2019 - 01:17 PM, said:

Let us discuss tactics theory.

 

NEW Navigational Radio Equipment — enhances aircraft concealment and increases its view range from +5% up to +14.6% The downside is that you lose up to 14% of fire accuracy as compared to Ultimate Gyroscopic Sight. Sounds great for bombers and GAs but with neutral defensive aircraft in the game its use seem limited. If a bomber or GA want to cap new base unseen, it will always be spotted by defence aircraft. So with any other plane class. Concealment was big thing pre 2.0 but now? We have to see if it pays out in real battles.

 

GA definitely have better options than to go for concealment. Fire probability for example.

Factories don't have any ADA but I see another problem. Extremly high flying bombers are already detached from the battle. If they become invisible they are even more detached. Instead of this they should implement a new plane class: armed satellites



svadilfari #26 Posted 13 April 2019 - 12:14 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 4546 battles
  • 388
  • [FEED] FEED
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostblindfoId, on 11 April 2019 - 02:18 PM, said:

 

I'm sorry I cannot find any mention of Tier VIII. It's VII for me:

Posted Image

 

yea they fixed it. it said VIII in the  2.0.11.6 article at first

DoomHerald #27 Posted 14 April 2019 - 03:26 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 6678 battles
  • 106
  • [FEED] FEED
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

Is there any freaking chance this ritardness to be fixed one day? Total useless bots in my team didn't manage to cap the whole freaking game one CC, so I lost with over 27k PP, 47 ground targets (not sections - whole objects!) destroyed, 215 sections, 930 cap points and ofc a LOSS. Why that game is so rigged?

What more do I have to do in order to win?!?!?!?!

Spoiler

 


Edited by DoomHerald, 14 April 2019 - 03:27 AM.


dreambill #28 Posted 14 April 2019 - 09:56 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 3115 battles
  • 693
  • [GR-12] GR-12
  • Member since:
    07-25-2013
As long as conquest mode remains, you cannot expect results according to your effort, you should have learned it by now. It's broken from the design of the mode (intentionally or unintentionally).

zen_monk_ #29 Posted 14 April 2019 - 09:59 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 5838 battles
  • 1,644
  • [__] __
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostDoomHerald, on 14 April 2019 - 03:26 AM, said:

 

 

Wow! Impressive score :honoring:

 

edit

and exactly this is why the First from the losing team should have rewards as per win.

1 - you earned it (you earned it)

2 - will dampen the rightful frustration

 

1 + 2 = better gaming experience = more satisfied customers = more support etc etc...

 


Edited by zen_monk_, 14 April 2019 - 10:06 AM.

stats were invented by Satan himself to suck the carefree fun out of gaming

DoomHerald #30 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:01 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 6678 battles
  • 106
  • [FEED] FEED
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View Postzen_monk_, on 14 April 2019 - 11:59 AM, said:

 

Wow! Impressive score :honoring:

 

edit

and exactly this is why the First from the losing team should have rewards as per win.

1 - you earned it (you earned it)

2 - will dampen the rightful frustration

 

1 + 2 = better gaming experience = more satisfied customers = more support etc etc...

 

 

It is implemented in WoT from years - if u obtain an epic medal during a loss - u get xp and credits same as a victory.

But yet, in WoWP the main problem is another - the game is rigged so sometimes from the very start u r doomed, no matter what u do, how hard u try and so on - the game has just decided u will lose cos ur bots are dieing like flies.



zen_monk_ #31 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:39 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 5838 battles
  • 1,644
  • [__] __
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostDoomHerald, on 14 April 2019 - 11:01 AM, said:

 

oss - u get xp and credits same as a victory.

 

...add materials as in victory for the same pp&achievements and we'll all be happy.

 

And it would be right. You busted your a** in that game and it's a shame to be wasted because their bots were better than yours. C'mon WG, all the players feel it and are frustrated! Make it already!


stats were invented by Satan himself to suck the carefree fun out of gaming

Bendersvk #32 Posted 17 April 2019 - 03:11 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 893 battles
  • 6
  • [OHEN] OHEN
  • Member since:
    09-27-2013
Everything is fine. Please WG add Chinese or French aircraft. Thanks! :honoring:


Piq_Mastika #33 Posted Yesterday, 06:11 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 4691 battles
  • 364
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    07-31-2017

View PostBendersvk, on 17 April 2019 - 05:11 PM, said:

Everything is fine. Please WG add Chinese or French aircraft. Thanks! :honoring:

 

French - OK. Chinese - I don't think anyone will be excited of adding these. Italian, Czech, Sweden or Pan-Europe will be great.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users