Jump to content


EF-131 or Su-10?

Gameplay

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

Poll: EF-131 or Su-10 (17 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 10 battle in order to participate this poll.

Which one will you get with your discount?

  1. EF-131 (8 votes [44.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.44%

  2. Su-10 (10 votes [55.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 55.56%

Vote Hide poll

elias_the_great #1 Posted 01 May 2019 - 07:56 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 2918 battles
  • 122
  • [MS-GR] MS-GR
  • Member since:
    01-06-2014

The event starts tomorrow and after it ends we will have the oportunity to get one of the two much cheaper...So which one will you get and why?

 

EF-131:

+ Strengths

  1. Faster
  2. Largest bombs in the game
  3. One powerfull rear gun with good firing angles
  4. Fast bomb reload
  5. Best altitude performance

 

- Weaknesses

  1. Lower HP than the Su-10
  2. Smaller bomb capacity
  3. Identical to the Ju 287
  4. No forward guns,relies only to the bombs to finish of ground targets

 

Su-10:

+ Strengths

  1. Gigantic HP
  2. Fast at medium altitudes
  3. Two powerfull rear guns
  4. Huge bomb load with powerfull bombs
  5. Unique playstyle compared to the previous planes in the line(that have identical playstyle from tier 5-9)
  6. Forward guns,good for harasing enemy bombers and finishing of weak ground targets.

 

- Weaknesses

  1. Slow bomb reaload time (not suited for the fast,low altitude bombing the player is used to with this line)
  2. Two rear guns, but are weaker than the t10 counterparts individually
  3. Different playstyle compared to the Pe-2s and the Tus

 

 


Edited by elias_the_great, 01 May 2019 - 11:43 PM.


elias_the_great #2 Posted 01 May 2019 - 08:01 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 2918 battles
  • 122
  • [MS-GR] MS-GR
  • Member since:
    01-06-2014
I bet my "discount" on the Su-10, seems better than the EF-131.Also i am already halfway getting the Ju 287 that seems identical to the EF-131...While the Tu-12 is not strong for its tier as the Ju 287 and Tu-10(for t8) are

Horcan #3 Posted 01 May 2019 - 08:07 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 5283 battles
  • 1,070
  • [ODV] ODV
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
Whichever i get first to ( if i ever will ), because i dont care about either. I did not wanted bombers in this game.

apartclassic #4 Posted 01 May 2019 - 08:19 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 20268 battles
  • 525
  • [W_R_E] W_R_E
  • Member since:
    01-21-2014
Really choose? Afaik we can get both, albeit with a month's interval

You have reached your quota of positive votes for the day


elias_the_great #5 Posted 01 May 2019 - 08:25 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 2918 battles
  • 122
  • [MS-GR] MS-GR
  • Member since:
    01-06-2014

View Postapartclassic, on 01 May 2019 - 08:19 PM, said:

Really choose? Afaik we can get both, albeit with a month's interval

 

You can get one cheaper...its most likely to get it first as well

RoyalFlyingCorps #6 Posted 02 May 2019 - 06:50 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 14753 battles
  • 889
  • [W___P] W___P
  • Member since:
    05-05-2016
I dare say the Russian bomber will be better than the German one, though it's quite likely both will be rubbish.  Yes, this is another example of my thoughts about Russian bias and before anybody says they see no evidence of this, consider the fact that the Yak-1 line outturns Spitfires when in reality a Spitfire would have had a Yak for breakfast in a turn fight.

2ugly #7 Posted 09 May 2019 - 08:30 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 4514 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    01-22-2014

View PostRoyalFlyingCorps, on 02 May 2019 - 06:50 AM, said:

I dare say the Russian bomber will be better than the German one, though it's quite likely both will be rubbish.  Yes, this is another example of my thoughts about Russian bias and before anybody says they see no evidence of this, consider the fact that the Yak-1 line outturns Spitfires when in reality a Spitfire would have had a Yak for breakfast in a turn fight.

 

Well...in reality yak is not that bad as you think...

zen_monk_ #8 Posted 09 May 2019 - 09:26 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Alpha Tester
  • 7473 battles
  • 2,403
  • [__] __
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

... Marcel Albert, World War II French ace, who flew the Yak-3 in USSR with the Normandie-Niémen Group, considered it a superior aircraft when compared to the P-51D Mustang and the Supermarine Spitfire.[3]

 

... The Luftwaffe issued an order to "avoid combat below five thousand metres with Yakovlev fighters lacking an oil cooler intake beneath the nose!" ...

 

...just on the main Wiki page. Further research will reveal that indeed it was "a king of the deck." (sneaky snake sniper Jack-3)


stats were invented by Satan himself to suck the carefree fun out of gaming                            


invader_from_mars #9 Posted 23 June 2019 - 12:21 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 8555 battles
  • 199
  • Member since:
    12-27-2013
Su-10 is GARBAGE compared to the german counterpart, period. The forward armament is completely useless, yes dear Wargaming, it is TRASH. If you want to shoot a red bomber, you wont hit any critical, meanwhile the enemy turretfire crits you like hell and eats your hp :bajan: well done :facepalm: oh and the bombs, oh my god how pathetic, you have to drop min 2 (altitude 2500 m, not the freakn stratosphere) to destroy a freakn medium ground target, the accuracy is legendary (in the negative way 'fcourse). On the Su-10 you have a top turret (-10 gun depression) should i fly this thing on 1000 m altitude for the benefits? 

elias_the_great #10 Posted 23 June 2019 - 08:19 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Conquest Member
  • 2918 battles
  • 122
  • [MS-GR] MS-GR
  • Member since:
    01-06-2014

View Postinvader_from_mars, on 23 June 2019 - 12:21 PM, said:

Su-10 is GARBAGE compared to the german counterpart, period. The forward armament is completely useless, yes dear Wargaming, it is TRASH. If you want to shoot a red bomber, you wont hit any critical, meanwhile the enemy turretfire crits you like hell and eats your hp :bajan: well done :facepalm: oh and the bombs, oh my god how pathetic, you have to drop min 2 (altitude 2500 m, not the freakn stratosphere) to destroy a freakn medium ground target, the accuracy is legendary (in the negative way 'fcourse). On the Su-10 you have a top turret (-10 gun depression) should i fly this thing on 1000 m altitude for the benefits? 

 

You arent supposed to play it in high altitude...its a dive bomber that trades the godly bomb angles all the soviets have up to that point for gigantic bomb load...it has two rear guns that melt everything if you get both of them to fire and the gun is there just in case....its better than nothing. In all my Su-10 games i have never been outscored by a 131,enemy or ally alike...They have different playstyles for different players....but the Su-10 is by no means worse than the 131 or the other way around

Edited by elias_the_great, 23 June 2019 - 08:23 PM.






Also tagged with Gameplay

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users