Jump to content


The best rounds with the worst players... (or next time you ask for human team)


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

rheaghorn #21 Posted 24 September 2019 - 09:58 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Squadron Leader
  • 3422 battles
  • 422
  • [-IRON] -IRON
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdreambill, on 23 September 2019 - 10:22 AM, said:

I think rewarding the 1st place or 3 best places of loosing side with (fewer) materials is a good step that it doesn't destroy the "wining" concept.

NOT best HUMAN place, 1st place in general, if a bot is there no bonus for player.

 

View Postzen_monk_, on 23 September 2019 - 10:38 AM, said:

Only 1st place from the losing team.

 

If the bot is first, player second - sorry mate, try harder next time.

 

If there are several players on the losing team, again only the first one. Here's your incentive to play, to try hard even in obviously lost battles. Give your best, be No1 in your team and be rewarded as per win.

 

Hi all,

 

the problem with this rule is that the ranking is based on the efficiency and the chevrons obtained while it is not necessarily synonymous with progress for victory.

With bombers or assault for example, if sectors you attack aren't captured at least, you don't progress in the ranking ! :( 

The same thing on case of victory when all areas are captured, with bombers/assault you can no longer progress ...

 

 



Discontinued #22 Posted 24 September 2019 - 04:17 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Advanced Member
  • 2681 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    06-16-2019

 

 

 "May cause the explode problem"





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users